Re: parsing of if else command

[<pl...@pi...>]

On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:59:54 +0200, Tim Hoffmann  
<tim...@un...> wrote:

> Blocking is desirable, but it's more than I proposed. I was just
> thinking of a fix for nesting types 3) and 4) which I could manage in a
> short time. For a real blocking I would have to have a deeper look in
> the source code. I don't have the time for this now (maybe in two  
> months).


Maybe this should be done all or nothing rather than a stop gap.

 From the thread you linked we see it is get-aroundable as it is , although  
a bit clumbsy. I'm not sure the stop gap would be much better.

Ethans patch to fix load goes a long way since this was one thing I had  
tried to get around the current if sytax and , like he said, it failed.

It's a bit of a hack to use load but load patch fills the gap.

Blocks would really seem to be the way to a clean solution.

Thanks for bringing this up, it's already improved.

/Peter.