|
From: Allin C. <cot...@wf...> - 2008-03-20 03:32:11
|
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote: > Allin Cottrell wrote: > > Is there any real difference between "errorbars" and "errorlines"? > > Yes. "errorlines" relates to "errorbars" the same way > "linespoints" does to "points". > > > From the help for errorbars it sounds as if there should be a > > difference, but I can't see any in the output. > > The output of... what? Here's an example... Thanks, that clarifies things. I now realize that I wasn't seeing a difference because in the plots I was looking at the point forecast was plotted as a line in its own right, hence supplying the "missing element" in the "errorbars" plot style for the standard errors. > > One feature that would be nice to have -- and that, for a > > moment, I thought "errorlines" might provide -- is the ability > > to plot a primary series plus y-axis error high and low using > > just lines (and not vertical bars) for all 3 components. > > (This is the most common way of graphing forecasts with error > > bands in economics.) > > No. If that were what it did, it would be called "errorband" or > "corridor" ;-) OK. Then "errorband" would be nice to have, though not essential. Allin Cottrell |