|
From: <pl...@pi...> - 2008-02-22 18:50:11
|
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:00:35 +0100, Ethan Merritt <merritt@u.washington.edu> wrote: > On Friday 22 February 2008 04:35, pl...@pi... wrote: >> >> I have some time data I can't see how to format to get it read in >> correctly. The seconds being decimal notation. > This is a very long-standing request. See tracker items > 536517 Higher resolution in timeseries plot > 1078852 Flexible usage of geographic coordinates Yes, that latter request was pretty explicit in terms of nomenclature. It should be fairly straight forward to %DD as a minimum solution to that request to prevent overflow at 24. Taking the same line , higher precision timescale could use %MS eg %HH:%MM:%SS.%MS internally maybe using a second int for microseconds as in struct timeval would carry the least overhead. (Don't forget embedded systems, possibly without an fpu ;) ) Any data requiring finer than microsecond resolution is unlikely to be using hours or minutes. These two , %DD and %MS , would not seem too complex to add and would not require massive changes to the input / output specifiers. Thanks for the reply, Peter. |