Re: Plot order with pm3d?

[Petr M. <mi...@ph...>]

> So, I would expect that the following two plots
> would appear different:
> 
> set pm3d explicit
> splot [-2:2][-2:2] exp(-x**2-y**2) w pm3d, 2-exp(-x**2-y**2) 
> splot [-2:2][-2:2] 2-exp(-x**2-y**2), exp(-x**2-y**2) w pm3d
>
> But, both plots appear to be the same.

No, they are different! See the minimum of the top mesh, or try it with
	1-exp(-x**2-y**2)

> In a similar spirit, I noticed that when setting
> set pm3d (or set pm3d explicit) the surface hides
> the border, but when using set pm3d implicit, the
> border is always on top of the surface - even when
> setting set border back.
> 
> Again, is this a bug, or am I using the commands
> incorrectly?

I cannot reproduce this. 
Can you post the sequence of commands which does it wrong?

---
PM