Re: cp1254 support for emf term

[Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu>]

On Wednesday 09 January 2008 17:28, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> 
> What I'm suggesting here is that "set encoding CP1254" is a
> setting that, quite defensibly, could be acted upon only by emf term.

Could you explain your logic a little bit further?

It would seem to me that if the user needs a particular encoding
at all, presumably because the input data or scripts use that
encoding, then *all* output modes need to match.  Why would emf
be a special case?  If it's a matter of running under Windows,
wouldn't support for win.trm be at least as important?
 

-- 
Ethan A Merritt