|
From: Allin C. <cot...@wf...> - 2008-01-06 01:40:02
|
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Ethan Merritt wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2008 13:48, Allin Cottrell wrote: > > Sorry, I've lost track: what is the current state of UTF-8 support > > in the postscript terminal supposed to be? I sort of thought that > > "set encoding utf8" was working for term post, but it seems not. > > It works here. But you need to use a compatible font file... But don't we have one by default? (Namely, Helvetica or a clone thereof). > Note that in this [successful UTF-8 encoded] case it was > necessary to use the "adobeglyphnames" option. Thanks for the hint! I find that if I take my original UTF-8 encoded Polish graph, and put set encoding utf8 set term post eps color adobeglyphnames at the top, it then works fine. But this makes me wonder: if the default alternative to "adobeglyphnames" doesn't work with the default postscript font, why is adobeglyphnames not the default? Allin Cottrell |