Re: bug in x tic number placement

[Allin C. <cot...@wf...>]

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Ethan Merritt wrote:

> On Thursday 13 December 2007 06:48, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> > But things have regressed in this respect since 4.2.  This script
> > 
> > set term png font Vera 8
> > set output 'foo.png'
> > set xrange [-100000:100000]
> > plot x
> > 
> > produces correct output with 4.2 (i.e. the "100000" marker is 
> > fully visible) but shows truncated output with current CVS.  
> 
> Somehow the word "else" went missing in one clause of the
> boundary calculation.   Fixed in CVS.

Excellent.  Thanks.

Allin Cottrell