Re: bug in x tic number placement

[Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu>]

On Thursday 13 December 2007 06:48, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> But things have regressed in this respect since 4.2.  This script
> 
> set term png font Vera 8
> set output 'foo.png'
> set xrange [-100000:100000]
> plot x
> 
> produces correct output with 4.2 (i.e. the "100000" marker is 
> fully visible) but shows truncated output with current CVS.  

Somehow the word "else" went missing in one clause of the
boundary calculation.   Fixed in CVS.

-- 
Ethan A Merritt