|
From: <pl...@pi...> - 2007-11-06 08:48:17
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:02:32 +0100, Ethan Merritt <merritt@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >> > I am convinced that the texinfo system is far more trouble >> > than it is worth. >> >> I'll second that >> >> > Perhaps it should be removed from the >> > default build. We distribute a copy of gnuplot.texi anyway, >> > so there's not normally a need for the user to rebuild it. >> > >> >> It's also a huge dep. pkg IRCC it's about an order of magnitude bigger >> than gnuplot! I had some trouble compiling tetex > You are still confusing TeX (tetex) and gnu info. > Gnu info is only large because of emacs. I find both info and emacs > unusable, but I keep emacs installed on one machine so that I can > regenerate gnuplot.texi from time to time > But the really huge package is TeX (tetex), which is something else > altogether. > Many thanks Ethan, the touch sorted out my installation problem. Is there a way to remove these heavy dependancies? It seems you are about as keen on emacs as I am and tetex is a monster. One of the very appealing features of gnuplot is that it's a fully featured but lightwieght plotting tool. It seems a bit incongruous to have heavy deps for what seem to be accessory features. I'm using gnuplot on ARM embedded. At the moment it's running on a full debian image via nfs but when it goes onboard cruft will not be an option. BTW I was very favourably surprised how quickly it ran on that arch. A credit to both the power/wieght ratio of the ARM and the power/volume ratio of gnuplot. Kudos to all concerned. ;) |