|
From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2007-06-13 18:51:17
|
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 10:35, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > This problem is the result of a bit of sloppiness in programming and trying to > accomplish the whole tic layout in a simple hunk of code when it can't be done. > Basically, the fact is we *know* the beginning and end of the ranges as > entered. Why toss that information away by doing x_tic = x_min + x_delta + > x_delta + x_delta + ...? Because it is bad to have vanishingly small changes in the specified range cause large changes in the plot layout? -- Ethan A Merritt |