|
From: m s. <mw...@us...> - 2007-06-09 21:01:03
|
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ethan Merritt" <merritt@u.washington.edu> > To: gnu...@li... > Subject: Re: gnuplot-beta Digest, Vol 12, Issue 10 > Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:01:09 -0700 >=20 >=20 > On Monday 04 June 2007 13:14, Ethan Merritt wrote: > > On Sunday 03 June 2007 19:48, m sutton wrote: > > > I would like a couple of my patches to be considered for=20 > > inclusion into CVS: > > > > 1659135 dashed grid for GD term to accept linewidths > > > > OK, that's better than the earlier version. >=20 > On closer inspection, I'm not entirely happy. > This line: >=20 > static int png_linetype_dotted[MAXLINEWIDTH*MAXLINEWIDTH*5]; >=20 > ties up 0.2 MByte permanently, on the off-chance that we want > to change the grid width. Yeah I know, virtual memory is cheap these day= s. > But it's ugly. Doesn't 200,000,000 bytes of storage to specify > a 2+3 dot pattern seem a little outrageous? >=20 I originally selected static to avoid alloc/free overhead. Feel free to ch= ange to dynamic allocation. Regards, Mike Sutton --=20 Get a Free E-mail Account at Mail.com! Choose From 100+ Personalized Domains Visit http://www.mail.com today |