Re: Patches item #1729825 ready to go.

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Daniel J Sebald wrote:

> Well, it could be programmed that way [but what user keeps typing replot; replot 
> without making any changes in between? :-)].  The "do not put redundant commands 
> in the history stack" as gnuplot currently behaves has the same problem you're 
> pointing out.

Keep in mind with an option

   set history {full|condensed} {quiet|numbered}

it could be

   1 foo = 35
   2 plot x*foo
   3 foo = 25
   4 plot x*foo
   5 history
   6 foo = 20
   7 plot x*foo
   8 history

or

   1 foo = 35
   3 foo = 25
   6 foo = 20
   7 plot x*foo
   8 history

Dan