Re: Patches item #1729825 ready to go.

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Petr Mikulik wrote:
>>Let me toss this idea to Petr... What would you think of instead of removing 
>>items from the stack, say the user types
>>
>>foo = 35
>>plot x*foo
>>foo = 25
>>plot x*foo
>>history
>>foo = 20
>>plot x*foo
>>history
>>
>>and the result of the final history might be
>>
>>  1 foo = 35
>>  2 plot x*foo
>>  3 foo = 25
>>  6 foo = 20
>>  8 history
> 
> 
> no, plot x*foo will be the last.

You're right, that's what I indended.  Actually, the "history" would still be 
last as we are placing stuff in history, then processing, so it'd be

   1 foo = 35
   3 foo = 25
   6 foo = 20
   7 plot x*foo
   8 history

We place stuff in history first before processing so that the user can recall a 
command even if it failed (because of a one letter typo or something).

I can make that change in the patch.  I like that approach.

Dan