|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2007-04-10 06:34:27
|
Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote: > Daniel J Sebald wrote: > >> Will need to consider the behavior. I think "replot" reloading >> regular files, e.g., 'foo.dat' is sort of convenient. > > > Sometimes it is. At other times, for other usages, it may not be. For > mousing, e.g., it typically isn't. For mousing in 3D, this was changed > already, for just this reason. > > Based on what kind of oracle are to decide that the "replot" issued for > a plot with inline data isn't *meant* to require re-entry of all the > data? Or re-entry of only some of them, even? > > Replot has a reasonable, well-defined and ancient meaning in gnuplot. > I'm afraid I have to insist that a command doing a different job than > "replot" used to do, be given a different name than "replot". A new option "autoreload" won't fly? E.g., set autoreload off and the default is on, i.e., the current behavior? Dan |