|
From: m s. <mw...@us...> - 2007-02-12 03:44:57
|
>=20 > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 02:22:02 -0600 > From: Daniel J Sebald <dan...@ie...> > Subject: Re: symbol/color/line consistency in terminals > Cc: gnu...@li... > Message-ID: <45C...@ie...> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed >=20 > So, it seems to me that with PNG one is inherently restricted to=20 > low resolution plots. One could argue it is for network graphics,=20 > but still 1000x1000 in a compact format like PNG doesn't seem=20 > excessive. I agree. I use 1280x1024 as my default size to match full screen projectio= n for PowerPoint. >=20 > Say there were a "resolution #" option that would internally scale=20 > line thickness, pointsize, and fonts (have to have a mapping to=20 > medium, large, giant... unfortunately the largest font doesn't have=20 > very high resolution). At first I thought you meant resolution to be dots per inch (DPI). But I t= hink you really mean scaling as Ethan has elaborated on. However, it would be nice to set DPI somehow through GD. It would simplify= things when I import images into Word or PowerPoint. Mike Sutton =3D Search for products and services at:=20 http://search.mail.com |