Re: BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY and BACKWARDS_COMPATIBLE

[Petr M. <mi...@ph...>]

> How much of the old syntax does Octave still use?  Maybe we could
> continue to allow "set no<whatever>" even after disabling some of
> the more problematic items like bare integers (no keyword) for
> line types and point types.

It doesn't use "unset" at all, or maybe only in some newer scripts with 
pm3d/images.

---
PM