|
From: Petr M. <mi...@ph...> - 2006-11-19 13:34:59
|
>> I'd rather you remove the stupid compiler that emits them. > makefile.mgw > #DESTDIR = /c/Progra~1/Gnuplot4.1 > > any many other places still contain old strings. Can anyone grep for > them and replace them? By what? Isn't there some way to know whether that dir should be called "Program Files", "Programy", "Programme", etc? > Now a question: is anyone ready to help me to write a clean makefile > for MinGW for cross-compiling (which would be suitable to add to CVS) > or does that exist already? Do you really need it? I "crosscompile" gnuplot for Windows on Linux by means of MingW: I run the wine console (wcmd), and then do what is written for mingw: go to src/, type "make -f ../config/makefile.mgw", and it is done. Isn't there a Wine for MacOSX on Intel? > It would be extremely useful if developers wouldn't only put source > files on the web, but also binaries, at least for windows. I did so, see http://gnuplot.sourceforge.net/development/binaries/ >> But it would help a lot if those warnings would be removed with the >> three switches mentioned above, I think that cleaned makefile could be put into cvs, if you prepare it. Check also config.xxx. >> Microsoft has made it clear that they don't care about providing a >> working compiler, why should we care about supporting their broken product? > > OK, I accept that. There could be a message in that makefile that the compilation/binary/pgnuplot/... may not work for which version of the compiler. --- PM |