Re: SVG terminal driver

[<br...@ph...>]

Ethan Merritt wrote:

> On the other hand, the additional special-char tests in the
> 3 Oct patch were not necessary for my two test svg-viewers.
> So I conclude that they were intended to fix a problem with
> a different set of viewers.  Please re-test the current
> version to make sure I haven't broken it for you at the same
> time I was fixing it for me.

FWIW: the problem that triggered my (admittedly somewhat excessive) 
action on October 3rd is still fixed.

> Assuming it works for you also, should we copy the cvs
> version over to the 4.2 branch for inclusion in -rc2?

Yes.  The 4.2 branch should kept current on all simple bugfixes for the 
time being.  Only dangerous patches and new features have to be kept off it.