|
From: Daniel F. <boy...@gm...> - 2006-10-12 17:41:16
|
Hi Joe,
Thanks for that, this seems quite strange but probably means I'm
doing something wrong! I just replaced the old version with the new
developer version (4.2 rc1) in /usr/local/bin and left my system
configuration the same too. gnuplot 4.2 rc1 gives out the following
when started:
set term aqua
^
".gnuplot", line 1: unknown or ambiguous terminal type; type just
'set terminal' for a list
Pretty clear then that my version at least don't know what aqua term
is! Also, in the 'help set term' documentation aqua is not listed as
an option.
I pulled it from cvs, the actually version of is:
$Revision: 1.16 $, dated $Date: 2006/09/10 10:43:50 $.
I'm running MacOS 10.4.8 with XCode 2.4 on a 1.5Ghz G4 PPC.
Regards,
Daniel.
On 12 Oct 2006, at 17:06, Joe Koski wrote:
> on 10/12/06 9:01 AM, Daniel Farrell at boy...@gm... wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have recently need to apply a patch to gnuplot to add some
>> functionality. I applied it to the developer version of gnuplot
>> (4.2). However, it seem that the aqua terminal is not an option for
>> this version. Do you have any advice? Should I apply the patch to the
>> current release version instead? Or are there some compile options
>> that I can turn on to make it available?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Daniel.
>>
> Daniel,
>
> AquaTerm works with gnuplot-4.2.rc1 on my G5 Mac built with OS X
> 10.4.8 and
> Xcode-2.4 developer tools. I did nothing more than my old
> configuration for
> gnuplot-4.0 to build it. All my old gnuplot and octave routines work
> properly with AquaTerm.
>
> The only issue that I have with AquaTerm is that octave now passes
> figure
> numbers via the gnuplot command line, not with set term. This means
> that all
> figures are Figure 0 for octave/gnuplot/aqua, which can become
> confusing
> when several windows are open. The wxt terminal will have the same
> issue.
>
> Joe
>
>
|