|
From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2006-09-27 17:04:33
|
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 09:43 am, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > Chris Monson wrote: > > Reading the posts again, it would appear that this means that > > sgngam is broken on my system, but that everything else > > (gamma-related, anyway) is working correctly. Am I reading that > > right? More or less. What seems to be happening is that the autoconfigure tool thinks that it has found a gamma function equivalent to lgamma, whereas on your machine "gamma" is really tgamma instead. We can fix that eventually. > I'd say this needs to be addressed before 4.2 release. Nah. This is just one more oddity that an OSX packager would have to sort out when building a binary distribution. Once the user is up and running there is no problem at all. -- Ethan A Merritt Biomolecular Structure Center University of Washington, Seattle WA |