Re: tiny fonts with wxt term

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Richard Henwood wrote:

> Anyway... here you go:
> 
> http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/cll/skills/eportfolio/students/eportfoliodirectory/current/phrfaj/gnuplotproblems/gnuplotfontproblem2.png

Thanks.  Well, clearly the font is tiny.  Furthermore, there is something interesting about the polygon compared to what I see in the x11 "test".  In your screenshot the polygon looks nice and symmetric.  In the x11 test on my screen (see below) I'm seeing an asymmetric polygon.  The aspect ration for the two screen shots is about the same.  I can understand that the lines might be a different thickness and that sort of thing.  But why should the aspect ration of the polygon be so different?


>>Richard, we've just had a discussion about wxt/x11.  You chose wxt because
>>why?  It was the default?  Just curious.
>>
> 
> 
> Once I got it compiled in, it was the default so it sorta' chose me!
> I'll follow up to 'default: x11 or wxt' thread.

OK, well that is something for the developers to think about.  If we are going to have wxt as one of the defaults on some systems, we should be reasonably certain it works.  We don't want the community's first impression of wxt to be negative.

Dan