|
From: Petr M. <mi...@ph...> - 2006-08-14 04:38:12
|
>>> Shouldn't we expect the same error message? >>> (and "internal error: ...", not "... error : ...") > >Is this 4.2 critical? Yes; you've shown that exists() doesn't work properly. > The important thing is the return value, not the error message. This is the correct patch! With this patch, the exists(...) works as expected. Note: non-INTGR, INT or CMPLX, ... cannot it write INTEGER, COMPLEX? --- PM |