|
From: <tim...@en...> - 2006-07-28 18:15:56
|
Hans-Bernhard Br=F6ker wrote: > Guys, I suspect we're chasing a red herring. > > Let me repeat this: > > Hans-Bernhard Br=F6ker wrote: > =20 >> gnuplot_x11 isn't even supposed to be started by this run of gnuplot.=20 >> And it isn't --=20 >> =20 > > gnuplot_x11 is *not* actually needed by tutorial/Makefile's invocations= =20 > of gnuplot. I know that for several independent reasons: > > 1) my local working copy is versioned 4.2-rc1, so it looks for=20 > /usr/local/libexec/gnuplot/4.2/gnuplot_x11, which never existed at any=20 > time during this exercise. > > 2) To be extra sure, I *removed* all installed gnuplots from this cygwi= n=20 > box, and it still failed to fail. > > 3) the LaTeX and EPS output files are generated in spite of those messa= ges. > > We're looking at *warnings* here, not errors. I think I have found what is needed to reproduce the error. I tried with ./configure --with-readline=3Dgnu, and get the "Exec"=20 warning, the 'make' error, and no .tex nor .eps files generated. However, with ./configure (i.e. with the builtin readline), I get the=20 "Exec" warning but the .tex and .eps files _are_ generated. =3D> There is a problem with GNU readline. Timoth=E9e |