|
From: <br...@ph...> - 2006-07-28 10:27:18
|
Guys, I suspect we're chasing a red herring. Let me repeat this: Hans-Bernhard Br=F6ker wrote: > gnuplot_x11 isn't even supposed to be started by this run of gnuplo= t.=20 > And it isn't --=20 gnuplot_x11 is *not* actually needed by tutorial/Makefile's invocatio= ns=20 of gnuplot. I know that for several independent reasons: 1) my local working copy is versioned 4.2-rc1, so it looks for=20 /usr/local/libexec/gnuplot/4.2/gnuplot_x11, which never existed at an= y=20 time during this exercise. 2) To be extra sure, I *removed* all installed gnuplots from this cyg= win=20 box, and it still failed to fail. 3) the LaTeX and EPS output files are generated in spite of those mes= sages. We're looking at *warnings* here, not errors. |