Re: gnuplot.doc suggestions

[<tim...@en...>]

Bastian Maerkisch wrote:
> Hi,
> I just came across some little things in the docs:
>
> * There's still a reference to 'if compiled with pm3d' in `help epslate=
x`
>  =20
I removed that one.
> * There's a reference to `set ticscale`, which is deprecated in favour =
of `set tics scale`, in `help epslatex`.
>  =20
Fixed too.
> * The list of terminals which support pm3d is incomplete (wxt is missin=
g)
>  =20
I've added wxt in this list (and in other lists where it is making sense).
> * I suggest a similar list for `enhanced text`.
>  =20
wxt added too (the list is in the "News" section at the beginning)
I guess
> * The `enhanced text` section is labeled `enhanced postscript` (at leas=
t on Windows and OS/2).
>    That's a bit misleading nowadays, I think.
>  =20
And I must add that the corresponding help text lives in term/post.trm,=20
not in docs/gnuplot.doc. Should probably be moved, but that's not critica=
l.
As per the `enhanced postscript` name, it is only one of several working=20
ways to call it (among `enhanced` and `enhanced text` for example).=20
There is only one reference to `enhanced postscript` in the doc, which=20
seems to be refering to the Postscript terminal precisely. I will look=20
into that.

The doc definitely needs some attention, in particular the whole "What's=20
new" section. I can do my best using what is described in the NEWS file,=20
but if I can be pointed out the changes that are not mentioned in that=20
file, that would help.

Thanks for the report.

Best regards,

Timoth=E9e