|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2006-06-09 06:50:43
|
Timoth=E9e Lecomte wrote: > I would prefer the opposite reasoning : gnuplot is distributed mainly i= n=20 > binary form by distributions. To avoid them legal issues (even if it is= =20 > likely that nobody will complain in a court), it is better to default t= o=20 > the choice that legally works in any situation. I am sure a packager=20 > prefers working on a program that does require a minimum of customizati= on. >=20 > How many users are really compiling gnuplot from source regularly ?=20 Probably a lot; because it is so easy and fast to compile. > I like Bastian's idea to use a BSD-licensed equivalent, if it is=20 > maintained and broadly available. Otherwise it is gnuplot's license tha= t=20 > needs some more attention. It is a matter of honesty. Well, the license thing we've talked about at length. I still don't see = why so many people put so much effort into programming gnuplot, yet the l= icense issue gets little attention. Dan |