Re: stat.inc

[<br...@ph...>]

Daniel J Sebald wrote:
> The way to address this would be to define
> 
> #
> #define unit step function
> #
> u_step(x) = x<0 ? 0 : 1
> 
> then multiply all the pertinent density/distribution functions by the 
> unit step.

I think it would be easier to just prefix the existing definitions with

	x<0 ? 0 :

> Should I put together a patch for this?

Sure.