Re: z_floor and z_ceiling (was Re: various observations)

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Daniel J Sebald wrote:
 (They probably 
> wouldn't be the same numbers as the current assignment, because I think 
> there are some conflicts there.  E.g.,
> 
> 4   top         bottom right front
> 
> means "top" in one context, "bottom" in another.  But the two syntaxes 
> could still exist if we simply write the 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, etc. as strings 
> with an associated number as well.)

On second thought, that wouldn't work because we need to allow for the number to be anything, e.g., 3...  Oh, it could still be done fairly easily.

Dan