Re: Strange behaviour of "set xtics"

[<br...@ph...>]

Petr Mikulik wrote:
> I considered "unset tics": tics are not drawn, but nothing else changes, 
> so neither the base plane. 

Well, the base plane *does* change --- it vanishes.  As I see it, the 
whole reason the base plane exists is to allow the base grid to be far 
enough from the surface to not be confused with it.

> but later 'frac' and 'zvalue' are used instead of <level>. I think it 
> should be changed to
> 
>        set ticslevel <frac>
>        set xyplane <frac>
>        set xyplane at <zvalue>

Ethan: since it appears you introduced 'set xyplane', I think this up to 
you.