|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2005-11-09 22:59:41
|
Ethan Merritt wrote: > On Wednesday 09 November 2005 02:32 pm, Harald Harders wrote: >>This has been provided by my rejected patch, to remind you once again. > > > I would be glad to look at such a patch. > As I said, I don't recall seeing anything like that. > So you extended the TERM_TABLE entries for all terminal types to hold > canvas size values? That sounds like a lot more work than attempting > to maintain the canvas size in the core code, but you may be right > that in the long run it is the only approach that can succeed. > Too bad it means revisiting every single terminal driver. This is just what I was trying to get at with my last entry! :-) Dan |