|
From: Petr M. <mi...@ph...> - 2005-10-24 17:15:16
|
>>>>> x = $1, y = $2 (autogenerated row and column index of the matrix) > > That's indeed at least slightly strange. It boils down to two questions, > which are strongly inter-connected: > > 1) Why not use existing pseudo-column numbers 0 and -1, instead of 1 and 2? I think $1, $2 and $3 is logic for this matrix case. > 2) Should > > 1 2 3 > 4 5 6 > 7 8 9 > > read by the ordinary routines, or to > > 0 0 1 > 1 0 2 > 2 0 3 yes, to this one, as it now works -- just the docs is missing >> You don't find it confusing that in 2D plots you need to say >> plot 'data' matrix using ($1):($3) No, because you "plot" (in 2D) a 3D object (matrix with axes). That's the same as for "plot ... with image". > Thus my suggestion is: we make up our mind about the answers to the above > questions, and add to 'help matrix' accordingly. That's what I meant when sending proposal for the new text of 'help matrix' and 'help matrix ascii'. Please update it if you like. --- PM |