Re: linestyle docs broken?

[Lars H. <lhe...@us...>]

Hans-Bernhard Broeker writes:
> Lars Hecking wrote:
> > But "with <style>" does not accept a "linestyle" or "ls" option,
> 
> If so, that's quite clearly a bug.
> 
> > If you agree, I'll commit the change to cvs. Or should the could change

 Sorry, I meant: should the code change, i.e. should the linestyle/ls option
 be created?

> > to match the docs? 
> 
> The latter.
> 
> > I think I've seen quite a few scripts using
> > "plot foo with lines N".
> 
> Of course --- but those should all be legacy scripts, from the time 
> before 'linetype' was an named argument, and that 'N' does *not* mean 
> 'ls <N>' but 'lt <N>'.

 Confusing. So the documentation should be changed

 Syntax:
       with <style> { <line_type>
                      | {{linetype  | lt <line_type>}
         ....

 ?