|
From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2005-10-13 16:19:11
|
On Thursday 13 October 2005 09:05 am, Ethan Merritt wrote: > I strongly advocate that "set size" be limited to sizes equal > or less than 1.0 Let me phrase that in a different way: I strongly advocate that "set size" have the same behaviour regardless of whether it is called before or after "set term". It should affect the scaling of the next plot to be drawn, but it should never affect the size of the canvas[*]. * Canvas: The image size in pixels for pixel devices, the BoundingBox for postscript or TeX devices, the paper size for pen plotters. As before, I note that backwards compatibility is out of question because there is no consistent behaviour to be compatible with. -- Ethan A Merritt merritt@u.washington.edu Biomolecular Structure Center Mailstop 357742 University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 |