Re: linestyle docs broken?

[Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...>]

Lars Hecking wrote:
>  But "with <style>" does not accept a "linestyle" or "ls" option,

If so, that's quite clearly a bug.

>  If you agree, I'll commit the change to cvs. Or should the could change
>  to match the docs? 

The latter.

 > I think I've seen quite a few scripts using
>  "plot foo with lines N".

Of course --- but those should all be legacy scripts, from the time 
before 'linetype' was an named argument, and that 'N' does *not* mean 
'ls <N>' but 'lt <N>'.