it works! many thanks Thomas!
Thomas Sefzick wrote:
>
> you need the arrows in the 1st plot only, so
> unset arrow
> before doing the 2nd plot.
>
>
> JamesBrown wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have the following problem:
>> In a script file (attached below) I set a single arrow like
>>
>> set arrow 1 from 24.5, -4.3015 to 23.05, -4.30605 nohead lw 2
>>
>> but instead giving the desired arrow this command outputs an arrow plus a
>> strange vertical line across the whole graph.
>> I have a similar problem with set arrow 2, but with arrows 3, 4 and 5
>> everything is alright though the command are the same.
>> It looks like this strange behavior for the arrows 1 and 2 strongly
>> depends on the y-coordinate of the initial point.
>>
>> I have now idea what is happening.
>> Could please anyone help me with this problem?
>> The script file, the file with data for plotting and the output image
>> file are attached below.
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>> Sincerely Yours,
>> James
>>
>> P.S.:
>> my gnuplot version: Version 4.4 patchlevel 2
>> system details: OS: Linux 2.6.37.6-0.11-desktop i686
>> System: openSUSE 11.4 (i586)
>> KDE: 4.6.00 (4.6.0) "release 6"
>> computer: laptop Asus X72J
>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p34348260/UTF-8BZW5lcmd5X2NvbnZlcmdlbmNlLmpwZw.jpeg
>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p34348260/energy_convergence.gnu
>> energy_convergence.gnu
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/problems-with-%22set-arrow%22-command%3A-instead-single-arrow-it-produces-in-addition-a-vertical-line-across-the-whole-graph-tp34348260p34348277.html
Sent from the Gnuplot - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
