You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(39) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(62) |
Apr
(58) |
May
(256) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(113) |
Dec
(68) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(60) |
May
(71) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(63) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(82) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(75) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(84) |
Apr
(104) |
May
(67) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(107) |
Aug
(138) |
Sep
(128) |
Oct
(106) |
Nov
(112) |
Dec
(112) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(94) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(146) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(53) |
Nov
(42) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(87) |
Jul
(56) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(139) |
Nov
(98) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(79) |
Mar
(83) |
Apr
(97) |
May
(124) |
Jun
(84) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(89) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(98) |
Dec
(78) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(97) |
Feb
(74) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(54) |
May
(63) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(58) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(40) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(35) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(56) |
Mar
(63) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(58) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(57) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(70) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(53) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(54) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(23) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(48) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(8) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
|
Apr
(26) |
May
(24) |
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
(22) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2026 |
Jan
|
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ico <gn...@ze...> - 2015-10-21 14:40:22
|
* On 2015-10-21 16:23:06 +0200, Marek W. Gutowski wrote:
> "%S" breaks at 60, not 100. You didn't read gnuplot's help, did you?
My apologies if I seem ignorant, but I did read all that before posting,
which is why I was using %s and not %S in the first place. Testing shows
that %S works well up to 99, and not 59 however. The documentation of
timefmt says about %S:
%S second, integer 0--60 on output, (double) on input
Which implies that output is limited from 0 to 60, but input is not.
> Anyway, the time format is tricky, I agree.
It seems, because I still can't get it right.
> Start your commands with
> gnuplot> set xdata time # this is concerns input data
> gnuplot> set format x "%H:%M:%S" # this is for ticks at plot's x axis,
> maybe "%M:%S" will suit you better?
> gnuplot> set timefmt "%s" # lower case, input data format
> Now you may check:
> gnuplot> show format
> gnuplot> show timefmt
> and, if satisfied, proceed with your "plot" command.
> I see a straight line, bingo!
Well, that's funny, I don't! The following snippet still gives me a
crooked line:
http://i.imgur.com/xaEOyPm.jpg
-------------------------
set xdata time
set format x "%M:%S"
set timefmt "%s"
show format
show timefmt
plot "-" using 1:2 with lp
1 0.5
2 1
3 1.5
4 2
5 2.5
6 3
EOT
---------------------------
Output of 'show format' and 'show timefmt'
tic format is:
x-axis: "%M:%S"
y-axis: "% g"
x2-axis: "% g"
y2-axis: "% g"
z-axis: "% g"
cb-axis: "% g"
r-axis: "% g"
read format for time on x axis is "%S"
read format for time on t axis is "%S"
read format for time on u axis is "%S"
--
:wq
^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C
|
|
From: Ico <gn...@ze...> - 2015-10-21 12:58:28
|
Hi Marek, * On 2015-10-21 14:43:02 +0200, Marek W. Gutowski wrote: > Your commands before plotting should be: > > set xdata time > set timefmt x "%S" > set format x "%S" > 1. note "S" (uppercase, not lowercase) Tried %S as well, but this breaks down as soon as the time in seconds exceeds 100: http://i.imgur.com/aUVNb2a.png So I must still be doing something wrong? > 2. note information about time format both for data AND for plot Actually I want the X axis to show time in [HH]:MM:SS format, which is the reason to choose 'xdata time' at first. So: - input time is seconds starting at 0 - output is time in 'human friendly' notation [HH]:MM:SS ------------------------- set xdata time set timefmt "%S" set format x "%S" plot "-" using 1:2 with lp 1 0.5 2 1 3 1.5 4 2 97 48.5 98 49 99 49.5 100 50 101 50.5 EOT ------------------------- -- :wq ^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C |
|
From: <gn...@ze...> - 2015-10-21 10:01:49
|
Hi Gnuplot-info, I'm trying to plot data on a relative time scale starting at 0 the input is a column of seconds and a column of data. --------------------------- set xdata time set timefmt "%s" plot "-" using 1:2 with lp 0 0.0 1 0.5 2 1.0 3 1.5 EOF --------------------------- can someone explain why I get these results: http://i.imgur.com/lBmk5di.png The data should be a straight line, but gnuplot seems to have a problem dividing the X asis when using time. Thank you, -- :wq ^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C |
|
From: sfeam <sf...@us...> - 2015-10-11 18:00:11
|
On Sunday, 11 October 2015 12:02:47 PM Jon wrote: > I did replot after changing these settings, but don't see any change, which > surprises me. > > Thanks for further help, my gnuplot version is 4.2 patch 6, is this too old > a version? Yes. That is too old (Sept 2009). In that version the x11 terminal did not support control of aspect ratios. Ethan > Sincerely, > Jon > > > > > > > Ethan > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:20 PM, sfeam <sf...@us...> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, 08 October 2015 01:33:36 AM Jon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, I tried to plot the data attached with the following > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set view equal xyz > > > > > > > > > > > > > set view 0,0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > splot 'aaa' u 1:2:3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but cannot get a square shape on the xy plane, any cure for it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But you didn't draw a square. > > > > > > > > > > > > As is clearly visible in the figure you attached, you drew a > > > > > > > > > > > > rectangle that is 2 units by 1 unit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The "set view equal xyz" command makes sure that the unit length > > > > > > > > > > > > is the same on all axes. I.e. the aspect ratio is 1. > > > > > > > > > > > > But it's still up to you to draw something with the right dimensions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ethan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both data and what I got is attached. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:06 AM, sfeam <eam...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 06 October 2015 09:51:44 AM Jon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been fighting with it for some time and would like to > > know a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution. I want the 3D plot to be shown with a cube with actual > > > > > > equal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > length of x,y,z. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set view equal xyz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
From: Jon <dev...@gm...> - 2015-10-11 16:02:53
|
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:31 AM, sfeam <sf...@us...> wrote: > On Sunday, 11 October 2015 11:14:31 AM Jon wrote: > > > Thanks for your response. I did have points on x axis twice that of y > axis, > > > but x,y range are the same, both from -1 to 1. > > > > So if you had filled both x and y it would have been a square, right? > > Isn't that what you wanted? > Yes, this is what I would like to achieve. If you think you can achieve the effect I am after, could you please send back your plot based on my input data? > > > Would set view care about how many points along each axis or it only > cares > > > about the values to be plotted? > > > > Neither. "set view" cares about the coordinate system itself, > > regardless of what points you do or do not plot. > > > > "set view equal xyz" gives you an orthogonal coordinate system so > > that a line segment from [a,b,c] to [a,b,c+1] has the same apparent > > length as one from [d,e,f] to [d+1,e,f] and so on. > > > BTW, why would the following two commands > > > > > > set term x11 size 10,600 > > > > > > set term x11 size 600,600 > > > > > > have no control on the output on the screen? > > > > > > Can anybody comment on that? > > > > It controls the size of the next x11 plot window you open. > > It does not change what is already on the screen. > I did replot after changing these settings, but don't see any change, which surprises me. Thanks for further help, my gnuplot version is 4.2 patch 6, is this too old a version? Sincerely, Jon > > > Ethan > > > > > Sincerely, > > > Jon > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:20 PM, sfeam <sf...@us...> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Thursday, 08 October 2015 01:33:36 AM Jon wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks, I tried to plot the data attached with the following > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set view equal xyz > > > > > > > > > set view 0,0 > > > > > > > > > splot 'aaa' u 1:2:3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but cannot get a square shape on the xy plane, any cure for it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But you didn't draw a square. > > > > > > > > As is clearly visible in the figure you attached, you drew a > > > > > > > > rectangle that is 2 units by 1 unit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The "set view equal xyz" command makes sure that the unit length > > > > > > > > is the same on all axes. I.e. the aspect ratio is 1. > > > > > > > > But it's still up to you to draw something with the right dimensions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ethan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both data and what I got is attached. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:06 AM, sfeam <eam...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 06 October 2015 09:51:44 AM Jon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been fighting with it for some time and would like to > know a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution. I want the 3D plot to be shown with a cube with actual > > > > equal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > length of x,y,z. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set view equal xyz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
From: sfeam <sf...@us...> - 2015-10-11 15:32:30
|
On Sunday, 11 October 2015 11:14:31 AM Jon wrote: > Thanks for your response. I did have points on x axis twice that of y axis, > but x,y range are the same, both from -1 to 1. So if you had filled both x and y it would have been a square, right? Isn't that what you wanted? > Would set view care about how many points along each axis or it only cares > about the values to be plotted? Neither. "set view" cares about the coordinate system itself, regardless of what points you do or do not plot. "set view equal xyz" gives you an orthogonal coordinate system so that a line segment from [a,b,c] to [a,b,c+1] has the same apparent length as one from [d,e,f] to [d+1,e,f] and so on. > BTW, why would the following two commands > > set term x11 size 10,600 > > set term x11 size 600,600 > > have no control on the output on the screen? > > Can anybody comment on that? It controls the size of the next x11 plot window you open. It does not change what is already on the screen. Ethan > Sincerely, > Jon > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:20 PM, sfeam <sf...@us...> wrote: > > > On Thursday, 08 October 2015 01:33:36 AM Jon wrote: > > > > > Thanks, I tried to plot the data attached with the following > > > > > > > > > > set view equal xyz > > > > > set view 0,0 > > > > > splot 'aaa' u 1:2:3 > > > > > > > > > > but cannot get a square shape on the xy plane, any cure for it? > > > > > > > > But you didn't draw a square. > > > > As is clearly visible in the figure you attached, you drew a > > > > rectangle that is 2 units by 1 unit. > > > > > > > > The "set view equal xyz" command makes sure that the unit length > > > > is the same on all axes. I.e. the aspect ratio is 1. > > > > But it's still up to you to draw something with the right dimensions. > > > > > > > > Ethan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both data and what I got is attached. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:06 AM, sfeam <eam...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 06 October 2015 09:51:44 AM Jon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been fighting with it for some time and would like to know a > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution. I want the 3D plot to be shown with a cube with actual > > equal > > > > > > > > > > > > > length of x,y,z. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set view equal xyz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
From: Jon <dev...@gm...> - 2015-10-11 15:14:38
|
Thanks for your response. I did have points on x axis twice that of y axis, but x,y range are the same, both from -1 to 1. Would set view care about how many points along each axis or it only cares about the values to be plotted? BTW, why would the following two commands set term x11 size 10,600 set term x11 size 600,600 have no control on the output on the screen? Can anybody comment on that? Sincerely, Jon On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:20 PM, sfeam <sf...@us...> wrote: > On Thursday, 08 October 2015 01:33:36 AM Jon wrote: > > > Thanks, I tried to plot the data attached with the following > > > > > > set view equal xyz > > > set view 0,0 > > > splot 'aaa' u 1:2:3 > > > > > > but cannot get a square shape on the xy plane, any cure for it? > > > > But you didn't draw a square. > > As is clearly visible in the figure you attached, you drew a > > rectangle that is 2 units by 1 unit. > > > > The "set view equal xyz" command makes sure that the unit length > > is the same on all axes. I.e. the aspect ratio is 1. > > But it's still up to you to draw something with the right dimensions. > > > > Ethan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both data and what I got is attached. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:06 AM, sfeam <eam...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 06 October 2015 09:51:44 AM Jon wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been fighting with it for some time and would like to know a > > > > > > > > > solution. I want the 3D plot to be shown with a cube with actual > equal > > > > > > > > > length of x,y,z. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set view equal xyz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
From: sfeam <sf...@us...> - 2015-10-08 16:22:29
|
On Thursday, 08 October 2015 01:33:36 AM Jon wrote: > Thanks, I tried to plot the data attached with the following > > set view equal xyz > set view 0,0 > splot 'aaa' u 1:2:3 > > but cannot get a square shape on the xy plane, any cure for it? But you didn't draw a square. As is clearly visible in the figure you attached, you drew a rectangle that is 2 units by 1 unit. The "set view equal xyz" command makes sure that the unit length is the same on all axes. I.e. the aspect ratio is 1. But it's still up to you to draw something with the right dimensions. Ethan > > Both data and what I got is attached. > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:06 AM, sfeam <eam...@gm...> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 06 October 2015 09:51:44 AM Jon wrote: > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > > > I have been fighting with it for some time and would like to know a > > > > > solution. I want the 3D plot to be shown with a cube with actual equal > > > > > length of x,y,z. > > > > > > > > set view equal xyz > > > > > > > > > > |
|
From: sfeam <eam...@gm...> - 2015-10-06 15:06:43
|
On Tuesday, 06 October 2015 09:51:44 AM Jon wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I have been fighting with it for some time and would like to know a > solution. I want the 3D plot to be shown with a cube with actual equal > length of x,y,z. set view equal xyz |
|
From: Jon <dev...@gm...> - 2015-10-06 14:51:50
|
Hi Guys, I have been fighting with it for some time and would like to know a solution. I want the 3D plot to be shown with a cube with actual equal length of x,y,z. Thanks, Sincerely, Jon |
|
From: Jon <dev...@gm...> - 2015-10-06 14:44:31
|
Thanks, it seems I confused about index and every. Sincerely, Jon On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBB...@t-...> wrote: > Am 05.10.2015 um 19:12 schrieb Jon: > >> I had supposed I understood the concept of block, but it turned out I >> cannot make the following file correctly read in by the command plot. >> > > The problem is that you have too many blank lines in your data. The > separation between blocks to be referenced by `every' is _one_ blank line, > not six. > > Multiple consecutive blank lines create the separation used by "index". > |
|
From: Hans-Bernhard B. <HBB...@t-...> - 2015-10-06 06:45:16
|
Am 05.10.2015 um 19:12 schrieb Jon: > I had supposed I understood the concept of block, but it turned out I > cannot make the following file correctly read in by the command plot. The problem is that you have too many blank lines in your data. The separation between blocks to be referenced by `every' is _one_ blank line, not six. Multiple consecutive blank lines create the separation used by "index". |
|
From: Jon <dev...@gm...> - 2015-10-05 17:12:36
|
Hi guys,
I had supposed I understood the concept of block, but it turned out I
cannot make the following file correctly read in by the command plot.
Thanks for your timely help,
Sincerely,
Jon
========================
The script is
p [0:] 'DY_SLICE_HIST_1' \
u 1:2 ev :::1::1 w lp, \
0 w l lt 0 noti
========================
The error message is:
Warning: empty y range [0:0], adjusting to [-1:1]
=========================
The data file is:
0.500000 10.000000
1.000000 10.000000
1.500000 10.000000
2.000000 10.000000
2.500000 10.000000
3.000000 10.000000
3.500000 10.000000
4.000000 10.000000
4.500000 10.000000
5.000000 10.000000
5.500000 10.000000
6.000000 -150.869613
6.500000 -18.160266
7.000000 0.000000
7.500000 0.000000
8.000000 0.000000
8.500000 72.597283
9.000000 0.000000
9.500000 -30.330369
10.000000 -10.665059
10.500000 0.000000
11.000000 -104.420593
11.500000 324.913103
12.000000 0.000000
0.500000 10.000000
1.000000 10.000000
1.500000 10.000000
2.000000 10.000000
2.500000 10.000000
3.000000 10.000000
3.500000 10.000000
4.000000 10.000000
4.500000 10.000000
5.000000 10.000000
5.500000 10.000000
6.000000 -12.549764
6.500000 65.940683
7.000000 0.000000
7.500000 0.000000
8.000000 23.792985
8.500000 196.251685
9.000000 0.000000
9.500000 -33.030966
10.000000 49.334910
10.500000 0.000000
11.000000 -39.118330
11.500000 19.649621
12.000000 11.086108
|
|
From: m_marina_cm <m_m...@ho...> - 2015-09-10 13:45:44
|
-------- Missatge original -------- De: MARINA CORBELLA MORATO <mar...@ub...> Data: 10/09/2015 9:42 (GMT-05:00) A: gnu...@li... Assumpte: Fitting output data of a fortran script by modifying input of the script Hi everyone! I'm totally new in gnuplot and the thing is that I'm trying to fit an spectra that can be deconvoluted in 8 functions. But the data that I want to fit must be processed before the fitting, so I made a fortran program to process it. Is there any way with gnuplot to fit the output data of my program but modifying the input data iteratively? Thank you! |
|
From: Jose G. <jos...@ya...> - 2015-09-01 13:45:17
|
Here are the links: https github.com/tuxcell/gnuplotcartography CRAN - Package Rgnuplot https cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rgnuplot/index.html Just place semi colon dash dash to replace the space after https https://github.com/tuxcell/gnuplotcartography https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rgnuplot/index.html |
|
From: Joseph G. <jos...@ya...> - 2015-09-01 13:32:54
|
Hello, Here is a library of gnuplot functions for cartographic projections in 2D and 3D https github.com/tuxcell/gnuplotcartography run gnuplot demo1.gnu gnuplot demo2.gnu gnuplot demo3.gnu And an R-package (Programming interface): CRAN - Package Rgnuplot https cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rgnuplot/index.html The R package can create maps for gnuplot from image files (jpeg, PNG, etc) or shapefiles and plot them in over a dozen cartographic projections |
|
From: Jon <dev...@gm...> - 2015-08-13 16:27:22
|
sorry, my mistake ... but gnuplot might have output inconsistent error message, actually it is the y range which is invalid. y column is beyond the valid range in the dataset. On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Jon <dev...@gm...> wrote: > Dear All, > > I am trying to plot the following > > p 'test_tJ_rep_10_NanNNHop/1.0/-0.25/12.0/12t90u95aa.j' u 1:9 ev ::500 w p > > it complains > > x range is invalid > > It seems not an issue with finding the file, as otherwise it will complain > > warning: Skipping unreadable file > "test_tJ_rep_10/1.0/-0.25/12.0/12t90u95aa.j" > No data in plot > > I thus wonder whether this is related to the hyphen used in the path. If > so, how to fix it? > > Thanks, > > Sincerely, > Jon > |
|
From: Jon <dev...@gm...> - 2015-08-13 16:16:17
|
Dear All,
I am trying to plot the following
p 'test_tJ_rep_10_NanNNHop/1.0/-0.25/12.0/12t90u95aa.j' u 1:9 ev ::500 w p
it complains
x range is invalid
It seems not an issue with finding the file, as otherwise it will complain
warning: Skipping unreadable file
"test_tJ_rep_10/1.0/-0.25/12.0/12t90u95aa.j"
No data in plot
I thus wonder whether this is related to the hyphen used in the path. If
so, how to fix it?
Thanks,
Sincerely,
Jon
|
|
From: Ethan A M. <eam...@gm...> - 2015-08-08 16:35:32
|
On Saturday, 08 August 2015 09:39:16 AM tar...@gm... wrote: > > Hi, > I'm trying to build a sort of bar-chart using a simple > data file (data_dlex) containing only 0 or 1. I'm using the following code: > > set style histogram rowstacked title textcolor lt -1 > set datafile missing 'nan' > set style data histograms > > plot '.data_dglob' using 2:xticlabel(1) lt -1 ,\ > '.data_dlex' using ( $2==0 ? 1 : 0 ) ls 17 title 'NA' ,\ > '' using ( $2==1 ? 1 : 0 ) ls 1 ,\ > for [i=3:19] '.data_dlex' using ( column(i)==0 ? 1: 0) ls 17 notitle ,\ > for [i=3:19] '' using ( column(i)==1 ? 1: 0) ls i-1 > > where the last two commands iterate over a potentially large number of > columns stacking white or colored boxes depending on the value of column > (i). To keep the same color order among different columns I would need to > merge the two iterations into a single one with two commands. > > Is it possible? Any suggestion on how to do that? The color sequence of the two histogram plots can be controlled by prefixing each with the "newhistogram" command. E.g. plot 'data' using ... ,\ newhistogram lt 1, for [i=3:19] 'data2' ..., \ newhistogram lt 1, for [i+3:19] '' ... Ethan |
|
From: <tar...@gm...> - 2015-08-08 07:39:24
|
Hi, I'm trying to build a sort of bar-chart using a simple data file (data_dlex) containing only 0 or 1. I'm using the following code: set style histogram rowstacked title textcolor lt -1 set datafile missing 'nan' set style data histograms plot '.data_dglob' using 2:xticlabel(1) lt -1 ,\ '.data_dlex' using ( $2==0 ? 1 : 0 ) ls 17 title 'NA' ,\ '' using ( $2==1 ? 1 : 0 ) ls 1 ,\ for [i=3:19] '.data_dlex' using ( column(i)==0 ? 1: 0) ls 17 notitle ,\ for [i=3:19] '' using ( column(i)==1 ? 1: 0) ls i-1 where the last two commands iterate over a potentially large number of columns stacking white or colored boxes depending on the value of column (i). To keep the same color order among different columns I would need to merge the two iterations into a single one with two commands. Is it possible? Any suggestion on how to do that? Thanks in advance. |
|
From: Joseph G. <jos...@ya...> - 2015-08-07 19:59:56
|
Hello, Here is a library of gnuplot functions for cartographic projections in 2D and 3D run gnuplot demo1.gnu gnuplot demo2.gnu gnuplot demo3.gnu And an R-package (Programming interface): CRAN - Package Rgnuplot CRAN - Package Rgnuplot | | | | | | | | | CRAN - Package RgnuplotOS X Snow Leopard binaries: r-release: not available, r-oldrel: not available | | | | View on cran.r-project.org | Preview by Yahoo | | | | | |
|
From: Dave H. <da...@ho...> - 2015-08-03 18:31:33
|
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Thomas Sefzick wrote: > depending on the version of "date" you may switch padding off: > > #> date +%m > 08 > #> date +%-m > 8 It works! It's an obscure glibc option; thanks. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." Watson never said: "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." |
|
From: Dave H. <da...@ho...> - 2015-08-03 18:22:07
|
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015, sfeam wrote: > > > I've just spotted a weird problem in one of my scripts. I'm > > > manipulating the date, and I have the line "month = `date +%m`" to > > > extract the month as a number. > > If it's in back-tics, it's being interpreted by the shell, not by > gnuplot. So that particular example says nothing about how gnuplot > processes month numbers. You sure it's the shell, and not the GP assignment "month = 08" ? I suppose I'll have to pipe it through "sed" or something; talk about violating the POLA... -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." Watson never said: "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." |
|
From: Thomas S. <t.s...@fz...> - 2015-08-03 07:32:26
|
sfeam <eamerritt <at> gmail.com> writes: > ... > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Dave Horsfall <dave <at> horsfall.org> wrote: > > > > > Version 5.0 patchlevel 1 last modified 2015-06-07 > > > > > > I've just spotted a weird problem in one of my scripts. I'm manipulating > > > the date, and I have the line "month = `date +%m`" to extract the month as > > > a number. > > If it's in back-tics, it's being interpreted by the shell, > not by gnuplot. So that particular example says nothing about > how gnuplot processes month numbers. depending on the version of "date" you may switch padding off: #> date +%m 08 #> date +%-m 8 |
|
From: Kevin K. <kk...@gm...> - 2015-08-03 02:34:14
|
Suppose I have a plot where the y-axis labels are: 0, 100, 200, 300, 400 ... 1000. Is it possible to display the 200, 300, and 500 labels in red, but the other labels in black? Thanks Kevin |