|
From: Jeff C. <je...@th...> - 2011-10-28 22:24:21
|
On 10/28/2011 4:13 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: > Would I upload just the patched binaries (for Windows XP 32 bit; I > could also build Debian x86 32 bit), or just the source patches, or > the full source? Or some combination? I prefer monotone over > subversion, but I guess I can cope; the only project oriented website > I'm aware of that has a monotone backend is the monotone site itself > :). Also, I'd like to have a web page/wiki with 'howto' stuff; it's > not easy figuring out how to do Ada in Android. I guess I could edit > the Gnu Ada Sourceforge wiki if you add me as admin? Binaries are good because many people don't want the complexity of doing a build however, you also need to put the source here as well to comply with the GPL. The easiest way of being fully compliant is full sources (but for crispness, you probably want to post the full original source and your patches - in other words, not the patched sources). Agree that how to info is good. I'll send you wiki password (really just exists to prevent wiki spam) |