Menu
▾
▴
gnuada-maintainers — Issues related to package creation.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(8) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Simon W. <si...@pu...> - 2016-01-29 19:08:35
|
On 29 Jan 2016, at 17:07, Martin Krischik <kri...@us...> wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Hi Simon > > Simon Wright schrieb: > > > Can I be added as an administrator? (at least with wiki and ticket > > edit privs as well as the 'file upload' priv I clearly have now!) > lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuada-maintainers > > Done! Thanks! |
|
From: Martin K. <kri...@us...> - 2016-01-29 17:19:46
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Simon Simon Wright schrieb: > Can I be added as an administrator? (at least with wiki and ticket > edit privs as well as the 'file upload' priv I clearly have now!) lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuada-maintainers Done! Martin - -- Martin Krischik mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net https://sourceforge.net/users/krischik -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFWq5xNijwKaHyem9cRAnOBAKCD3BHxj3/q0A0JwoolKshyV4z77QCgkdZN 2a0hXd7oKMrR6YQBovwTOZg= =NPM6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Simon W. <si...@pu...> - 2016-01-28 16:46:59
|
There aren't many contributors any more - I'm one of them, for Mac binary releases. Can I be added as an administrator? (at least with wiki and ticket edit privs as well as the 'file upload' priv I clearly have now!) Best wishes to all, —S |
|
From: Dipl. I. M. K. <ma...@kr...> - 2011-10-29 13:37:29
|
Hello Stephen Am 29.10.2011 um 15:02 schrieb Stephen Leake: > It's bin a while since I used SourceForge. Do you want individual files > in the AdaCore sources commited to svn, or just a tarball, or is that > uploaded in some other way? Binaries should be uploaded as a tarball (or whatever is good for the platform). Sourceforge has changed the file release area to a normal directory structure created and filled with ssh / scp. So you create a directory following the layout used by the project and copy one or mmore tarballs into it. > Same for the patches, do they need to be in > svn, or just uploaded to the ftp area? Patches should be committed to svn. > Hmm. I see gcc-4.2.2 has the individual files on the wiki, but I don't > see them in the svn tree. I do see .diffs foir gcc in the svn tree. > > If I'm putting things in svn, what branch, and what directory path? There is one directory for each platform. For example MinGW: ./mingw/SOURCES/gcc-4.2-20061219.diff ./mingw/SOURCES/gcc-4.2-20070307.diff ./mingw/SOURCES/gcc-4.2.0-20070501.diff ./mingw/SOURCES/gettext-0.16.1.diff Inside each platform we usually use an rpm like directory structure: …/BUILD - temp build dir …/LOGS - log files …/SCRIPTS - shell / cmd build scripts …/SPECS - rpm build scripts …/SOURCES - source and patch files …/TARS - final output dir for tar files …/RPMS - final output dir for rpm files …/SRPMS - final output dir for rpm sources “Usually” — It is our spare time so if you consider the layout a hindrance then use something else. > I also see lots of 'rpms'; I assume that's Red Hat Package manager > files. I've never built one of those; is that required? Only for a platform where rpm is preferred. I also tried rpm for mingw but it is tricky. But then mingw is tricky. > I'm not clear what the 'Sources' wiki is for; it doesn't seem to match > the svn tree. The sources wiki is not a wiki but gnathtml generated documentation. Normally gnathtml is only included in Gnat/Pro but we have a copy. Actually a very old copy. We need to find a new sponsor. > Maybe a new top level section for "HowTos", with a subsection for "Ada > on Android"? Super idea. > Is the wiki in a cm system, for recovery in case I screw something up? I > will cm the main pages I post on my own, but I'm wondering about the > structure pages. Two levels: The wiki itself keeps the last 30 days of edits in a history. And from time to time we download the wiki (with rsync) and commit it to subversion (http://gnuada.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gnuada/pmwiki). Which I do right now (downloaded this morning - still have to commit). Regards Martin -- Martin Krischik Moosweg 13 CH-3324 Hindelbank Tel. +41-34-411-04-74 Mobil: +41-76-516-51-02 mailto://Martin@krischik.com http://www.krischik.com |
|
From: Stephen L. <ste...@st...> - 2011-10-29 13:02:34
|
Jeff Creem <je...@th...> writes: > On 10/28/2011 4:13 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: >> Would I upload just the patched binaries (for Windows XP 32 bit; I >> could also build Debian x86 32 bit), or just the source patches, or >> the full source? Or some combination? I prefer monotone over >> subversion, but I guess I can cope; the only project oriented >> website I'm aware of that has a monotone backend is the monotone >> site itself :). Also, I'd like to have a web page/wiki with 'howto' >> stuff; it's not easy figuring out how to do Ada in Android. I guess >> I could edit the Gnu Ada Sourceforge wiki if you add me as admin? > Binaries are good because many people don't want the complexity of > doing a build however, you also need to put the source here as well to > comply with the GPL. Right. > The easiest way of being fully compliant is full sources (but for > crispness, you probably want to post the full original source and your > patches - in other words, not the patched sources). Right. It's bin a while since I used SourceForge. Do you want individual files in the AdaCore sources commited to svn, or just a tarball, or is that uploaded in some other way? Same for the patches, do they need to be in svn, or just uploaded to the ftp area? Hmm. I see gcc-4.2.2 has the individual files on the wiki, but I don't see them in the svn tree. I do see .diffs foir gcc in the svn tree. If I'm putting things in svn, what branch, and what directory path? I also see lots of 'rpms'; I assume that's Red Hat Package manager files. I've never built one of those; is that required? > Agree that how to info is good. I'll send you wiki password (really > just exists to prevent wiki spam) Got it, and it lets me edit. Any hint on where to put this? I'm not clear what the 'Sources' wiki is for; it doesn't seem to match the svn tree. Maybe a new top level section for "HowTos", with a subsection for "Ada on Android"? Is the wiki in a cm system, for recovery in case I screw something up? I will cm the main pages I post on my own, but I'm wondering about the structure pages. I'm still wondering if putting the "howto" stuff here is better than on the Ada Programming wiki; it seems like that might have more visibility. It could point to GnuAda for downloading the tools and example sources. -- -- Stephe |
|
From: Stephen L. <ste...@st...> - 2011-10-29 12:45:37
|
"Dipl. Inform. Martin Krischik" <ma...@kr...> writes: > Hello Stephe > > Am 28.10.2011 um 20:57 schrieb Stephen Leake: > >> I could put them on my own website, but I'm wondering if the Sourceforge >> Gnu Ada site would be better. > > Sourceforge I would say. Give me your user id and I give you access. stephen_leake I also sent this to Jeff Creem, and copied to this list. -- -- Stephe |
|
From: Dipl. I. M. K. <ma...@kr...> - 2011-10-29 07:17:00
|
Hello Stephe Am 28.10.2011 um 20:57 schrieb Stephen Leake: > I could put them on my own website, but I'm wondering if the Sourceforge > Gnu Ada site would be better. Sourceforge I would say. Give me your user id and I give you access. Regards Martin -- Martin Krischik Moosweg 13 CH-3324 Hindelbank Tel. +41-34-411-04-74 Mobil: +41-76-516-51-02 mailto://Martin@krischik.com http://www.krischik.com |
|
From: Jeff C. <je...@th...> - 2011-10-28 22:24:21
|
On 10/28/2011 4:13 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: > Would I upload just the patched binaries (for Windows XP 32 bit; I > could also build Debian x86 32 bit), or just the source patches, or > the full source? Or some combination? I prefer monotone over > subversion, but I guess I can cope; the only project oriented website > I'm aware of that has a monotone backend is the monotone site itself > :). Also, I'd like to have a web page/wiki with 'howto' stuff; it's > not easy figuring out how to do Ada in Android. I guess I could edit > the Gnu Ada Sourceforge wiki if you add me as admin? Binaries are good because many people don't want the complexity of doing a build however, you also need to put the source here as well to comply with the GPL. The easiest way of being fully compliant is full sources (but for crispness, you probably want to post the full original source and your patches - in other words, not the patched sources). Agree that how to info is good. I'll send you wiki password (really just exists to prevent wiki spam) |
|
From: Stephen L. <ste...@st...> - 2011-10-28 20:13:27
|
Jeff Creem <je...@th...> writes: > On 10/28/2011 2:57 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: >> I recently got working an Ada Android 'hello world' app. I started with >> GNAT GPL 2011, but had to patch both jvm-gnat and jvm2ada. Some people >> on comp.lang.ada have said they'd like access to my patches. >> >> I could put them on my own website, but I'm wondering if the Sourceforge >> Gnu Ada site would be better. >> >> Any thoughts? >> > I like the idea :) Do you already have a sourceforge account. Yes; 'stephen_leake'. > If so, the easiest thing is to add you on as an admin so you can > upload this. Would I upload just the patched binaries (for Windows XP 32 bit; I could also build Debian x86 32 bit), or just the source patches, or the full source? Or some combination? I prefer monotone over subversion, but I guess I can cope; the only project oriented website I'm aware of that has a monotone backend is the monotone site itself :). Also, I'd like to have a web page/wiki with 'howto' stuff; it's not easy figuring out how to do Ada in Android. I guess I could edit the Gnu Ada Sourceforge wiki if you add me as admin? -- -- Stephe |
|
From: Jeff C. <je...@th...> - 2011-10-28 19:20:31
|
On 10/28/2011 2:57 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: > I recently got working an Ada Android 'hello world' app. I started with > GNAT GPL 2011, but had to patch both jvm-gnat and jvm2ada. Some people > on comp.lang.ada have said they'd like access to my patches. > > I could put them on my own website, but I'm wondering if the Sourceforge > Gnu Ada site would be better. > > Any thoughts? > I like the idea :) Do you already have a sourceforge account. If so, the easiest thing is to add you on as an admin so you can upload this. If not, you can either get one and I'll add you or I can upload it for you. |
|
From: Stephen L. <ste...@st...> - 2011-10-28 19:11:01
|
I recently got working an Ada Android 'hello world' app. I started with GNAT GPL 2011, but had to patch both jvm-gnat and jvm2ada. Some people on comp.lang.ada have said they'd like access to my patches. I could put them on my own website, but I'm wondering if the Sourceforge Gnu Ada site would be better. Any thoughts? -- -- Stephe |
|
From: Rod K. <ro...@do...> - 2008-06-20 13:51:31
|
Hi folks, Just a short note to say hello and mention some brief news regarding the Swig Ada module. I'd like to try to update Swig for both GPL08 and the latest formal Swig version (1.3.35). And, of course, also to try to improve the generated bindings. I've added a new directory tree (swig-1.3.35) to the 'Projects' directory, to house the updates. It's another 20meg, I'm afraid, but when completed, the old 1.3.29 tree can be removed (and good riddance ;). cheers, and thanks for your patience, Rod. |
|
From: Rod K. <ro...@do...> - 2008-06-20 13:46:09
|
Hi folks, Just a short note to say hello and mention some brief news regarding the Swig Ada module. I'd like to try to update Swig for both GPL08 and the latest formal Swig version (1.3.35). And, of course, also to try to improve the generated bindings. I've added a new directory tree (swig-1.3.35) to the 'Projects' directory, to house the updates. It's another 20meg, I'm afraid, but when completed, the old 1.3.29 tree can be removed (and good riddance ;). cheers, and thanks for your patience, Rod. |
|
From: Martin K. <kri...@us...> - 2007-02-28 20:35:05
|
Am Mittwoch 28 Februar 2007 schrieb Jeffrey Creem: > Took me a bit to figure out the magic that was done to properly include > the Sourceforge logo in the sidebar. Is that script we've got in the > cookbook directory published someplace? I stole a copy to put over on > the nxtada.sf.net site. You mean sourceforge.php? No I wrote that myself. > Seems like it would be a good addition to=20 > http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/SourceForgeServers Indeed. Martin =2D-=20 Martin Krischik mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net |
|
From: Jeffrey C. <je...@th...> - 2007-02-28 04:35:54
|
Took me a bit to figure out the magic that was done to properly include the Sourceforge logo in the sidebar. Is that script we've got in the cookbook directory published someplace? I stole a copy to put over on the nxtada.sf.net site. Seems like it would be a good addition to http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/SourceForgeServers |
|
From: <rom...@us...> - 2007-02-07 21:27:19
|
Thanks, Martin, for creating this mailing list. I see you've subscribed me,= so=20 let's see if it works. (I hope it's not going to transform my name=20 into "Björn" all the time!) Does the list accept mail from anyone or just from subscribers? If any of you don't get this message, please notify me. ;-) Bj=F6rn |