|
From: Steve N. <uso...@bu...> - 2021-12-01 18:08:58
|
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021, Liam Proven wrote: > Fair. For me, I left the IBM reseller that was my first job and moved > to a much smaller company, so I stopped working with a mixture of PC > DOS and MS-DOS and switched to mostly MS-DOS, with a little DR DOS. Meanwhile I started out with PC DOS 3.2, and mostly used the IBM dialect on my first couple machines. > There has been a little bit of renewed interest in PC DOS from the > late '90s onwards, especially with the recent retro-gaming trend, > because IBM continued development for some time, into this century, > while Microsoft switched focus to Windows only. Connectix' VirtualPC > program -- a PC emulator on MacOS, but a hypervisor on Windows -- used > to bundle PC DOS 2000 for free as its sample VM. So I suspect that a > bunch of new users first encountered it that way. And PC DOS is more compatible with MS-DOS than other DOSes, because, well, it *is* MS-DOS. > I run it PC DOS some of my Thinkpads, simply because it feels > artistically _right_ somehow to run an IBM OS on what was originally > IBM-designed hardware. :-) Likewise my PS/2 runs PC DOS. -uso. |