|
From: Steve N. <uso...@bu...> - 2021-12-01 01:26:49
|
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, Liam Proven wrote: > On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 22:35, Steve Nickolas <uso...@bu...> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, Deposite Pirate wrote: >> >>> PC-DOS is also strictly better than MS-DOS. Don't know of a valid >>> reason for anyone to bother with the latter anymore. >> >> For the most part, PC DOS *is* MS-DOS. > > Well, I agree with both of you. :-D > > Up until the last version of MS-DOS, 6.22, they were largely identical, yes. The division actually happened earlier - after 5.0. From 3.2 to the second issue of 5.0 (and in fact the second issue of MS-DOS 3.1) the two releases are effectively the same, apart from MS-DOS getting a few things before PC DOS, and the difference between FC/RAMDRIVE and COMP/VDISK. Although one feature did migrate from PC DOS to MS-DOS: Interlnk, which appeared first in PC DOS 5.02, and then MS-DOS 6. -uso. |