From: escape <es...@fr...> - 2011-04-21 20:50:44
|
Hello Henrique, Yeah, DOS cyrillic encodings is hell of a mess (good article on topic, you may already know, is http://czyborra.com/charsets/cyrillic.html). The RUSCII.GIF is known as codepage number 1125 ie CP1125. And there is some uncertainty about code points FAh & FBh. While some sources suggests that there must be middle dot and square root - There is article on wikipedia.org about different variants of DOS 866 code page - http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP1125 . It is in russian tough, but you can search the page for "CP1125". You'll find that RUSCII.GIF is actually a symbols chart for CP1125 as wikipedia means it. Other sources suggests that there must be division sign and plus-minus sign - I found this chart http://ascii-table.com/codepage.php?1125 but also it would be interesting to have a look at the "IBM documentation", you mentioned. And the best thing in this story, is that "Republic standard of Ukraine RST 2018-91" (http://www.terena.org/activities/multiling/koi8-u/ukrcod2018-91win.html) doesnt' describe anything at all beyond code point F9h, so code points FAh-FFh could look anything you like. On 21.04.11 20:29, Henrique Peron wrote: > Агов Константин, > > I used IBM documentation as reference. I was not aware of a particular > RUSCII table which, by the way, seems not to follow major industry > standards. I've compared your RUSCII.GIF with the documentation I have > and I found two discrepancies: > > * IBM documentation > Code point FAh: division sign > Code point FBh: plus-minus sign > > * RUSCII.GIF > Code point FAh: middle dot > Code point FBh: square root > > Two questions: > 1) Did you find any other discrepancies? > 2) Is there any other codepage number for which RUSCII.GIF is known? > > Thanks, > Henrique Peron > > P.S.: You can contact me directly through the e-mail address found in > the codepage pack documentation if you wish. > > > Em 21/4/2011 10:08, Садовой Константин escreveu: >> Hello all. In the EGA4.CPX ukrainian codepage font files is ugly? Symbol table of codepage for 1125 (Ukrainian national standart, described in RST 2018-91), is not equalient to this standart. Symbol table, equaliented to Ukrainian national standart, is present this (http://porokhnyak.org/cyr/ruscii.gif) image, but it is not equal to symbol table from the EGA4.CPX from the CPI package of FreeDOS. In the old mail lists I founded the letter of Henrique Peron, dated of Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:41:26, with subject: "Ukrainian language file" (this letter subject tree can be see in: http://www.mail-archive.com/fre...@li.../msg03628.html). Henrique wrote about use the symbols in the ukrainian codepage symbol table in the FreeDOS font for the codepage 1125. So, I see about FreeDOS CPI fonts for codepage 1125 is not equalient to ukrainian national standart description. Why? >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload >> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top >> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve >> application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting >> the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Freedos-user mailing list >> Fre...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-user mailing list > Fre...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user |