From: Carl S. <cw...@my...> - 2009-04-27 14:54:53
|
I do not know why the return path is munged in place of the real senders message. I would like to know if there is a corrective and if I can get an mbox version of the last few months messages to import to correct my archive. CWSIV X-Auth-No: Return-Path: <fre...@li...> Received: from myrealbox.com not authenticated [10.1.1.14] by gateway.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 12942 $ on Linux; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:37:19 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com) by h25xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <fre...@li...>) id 1LxkmW-0005kF-F6; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:31:12 +0000 Received: from sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.122] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by h25xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <e....@jp...>) id 1LxkmU-0005k3-G3 for fre...@li...; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:31:10 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (72vjzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of jpberlin.de designates 213.203.238.10 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.203.238.10; envelope-from=e....@jp...; helo=plasma.jpberlin.de; Received: from plasma.jpberlin.de ([213.203.238.10]) by 72vjzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1LxkmP-0003FL-Gl for fre...@li...; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:31:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (kristall.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.42]) by plasma.jpberlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F47F6438 for <fre...@li...>; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:31:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from plasma.jpberlin.de ([213.203.238.10]) by localhost (kristall.heinlein-support.de [213.203.238.118]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q9Sofk7K8GRn for <fre...@li...>; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:31:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.10] (82-171-18-186.ip.telfort.nl [82.171.18.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by plasma.jpberlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B7DF63EC for <fre...@li...>; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:31:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49F...@jp...> Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:31:04 +0200 From: fre...@li... User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fre...@li... References: <123...@ea...> <430...@ww...> <ef6...@ma...> In-Reply-To: <ef6...@ma...> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1LxkmP-0003FL-Gl Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Anyone know why 386 enhanced mode doesn't work Windows 3.1??? X-BeenThere: fre...@li... X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: fre...@li... List-Id: <freedos-user.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user>, <mailto:fre...@li...?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=freedos-user> List-Post: <mailto:fre...@li...> List-Help: <mailto:fre...@li...?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user>, <mailto:fre...@li...?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: fre...@li... X-Evolution-Source: pop://cw...@po.../ |