From: Eric A. <e....@jp...> - 2008-12-22 22:49:53
|
Hi everybody :-) First a correction about help.fdos.org - it does render okay in firefox, it is only outdated. Reason for the failure to display was a firefox update running exactly at the same moment... ;-). > wish to you all a great merry christmas/new year time! :) Thanks, same to you :-) > btw, which batches need review? http://fd-doc.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php?n=FdDocEn.FdInstall?action=diff explains that, kind of. Note that the page itself is damaged by spammers and that my own spam protection prevents me from undoing the damage without using file system access, sorry. So unless you migrate that page to the sourceforge mediawiki before that, we will have to wait until next week before I can fix "FdInstall". > talking about fdupdate, can we make fdupdate our package manager? No, why should we? FDPKG already exists and works well. FDUPDATE is for updates. If you find things where one could learn from the other, you can of course suggest that FDPKG and FDUPDATE should share more code there. > Count on me for FD 1.1! Thanks :-) Eric PS: http://fd-doc.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php?n=FdDocEn.FdDependencies is also useful, because I suggest that there should be an easy (only few keypresses) way to disable all network dependant aspects of the install, for offline installs. People can add network stuff later with FDPKG or even manually after downloading files within Windows/Linux. |