|
From: Jim H. <jh...@fr...> - 2005-06-29 17:36:29
|
Jeremy would like to keep freedos-cvs and freedos-kernel, but I think it's safe to assume we can close down the other lists I mentioned. I'll comment out freedos-devel-net, freedos-freecom, and fd-doc-list from the FreeDOS Mailing Lists page. If no further objections, I'll close down these 3 lists via SourceForge over the weekend. Please move discussion threads from those lists to freedos-devel. The lists that will remain open are freedos-cvs, freedos-kernel, freedos-user, freedos-devel. The FreeDOS-32 developers have their own freedos-32-dev list, and I'll still link to them from our pages. -jh Jim Hall wrote: > Sorry for the cross-post, but I wanted to make sure people knew about > the other list before I made changes. > > I've noticed that traffic on several of our lists has decreased to the > point of a trickle. It's been suggested to me that we try to > consolidate lists, to re-invigorate discussion among FreeDOS developers > and focus discussion to relevant development topics. > > Closing down some of the lists in order to funnel new users into a > common discussion area does seem to be a good move right now. > > I copied the list traffic stats into a spreadsheet so I could look for > trends. See http://www.freedos.org/jhall/temp/traffic/traffic.png > > > It's pretty clear that freedos-user, freedos-devel, and freedos-32-dev > are our most active lists. The others have declined in traffic since > about Sept 2004, if they had any traffic to speak of. That means the > lists to close down would be freedos-devel-net, freedos-kernel, > freedos-freecom, freedos-cvs, and fd-doc-list. > > So, I'd like to close down these 5 lists, and just have all traffic go > to freedos-devel. What do you think? > > -jh > > > -- I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him. |