|
From: Neil S. <cl...@di...> - 2006-02-12 20:37:55
|
Sorry about that. My economics lecturer used the term "good" to mean a type of commodity and i didn't bother to see if the rest of the world used the term in the same way. i'll rename it to GoodsType. - neil On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 19:53 +0100, Michael Burschik wrote: > I am sure that this is the right way to go. The only nit I have to pick > is the name of the "Good" class. I would prefer GoodsType. > > And maybe we should concentrate on getting release 0.5 out of the door > before making any drastic changes. > > Regards > > Michael > |