From: Milan B. <albis@EUnet.yu> - 2005-08-30 13:38:47
|
Michael Hieke wrote: >> What about the ".h"? Shouldn't it be removed when you use the <> syntax? > > I don't think so. It's only that C++ headers have no .h, so you can > tell them apart from old C headers (C stdio.h -> C++ stdio). Dropping > the extension will not work AFAIU. Yes. Currently, the behaviour is undefined if should you remove it, so it depends on complier vendors. > Milan: I've given up on wxWidgets as DLL for BCC. Everything I tried > failed :-( I'm soon to abandon Windows completely, so don't bother too much. I'll build FR with GCC or whatever in the meantime. > Maybe that code should not go into header files, unless there is no > implementation file (like template stuff in collection.h)? +1 from me on that. -- Milan Babuskov http://fbexport.sourceforge.net http://www.flamerobin.org |