You can subscribe to this list here.
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(73) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(133) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(57) |
2006 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(43) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(10) |
2007 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(5) |
2008 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(2) |
2009 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(56) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(41) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
|
Dec
(14) |
2011 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(9) |
2013 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(10) |
May
|
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(4) |
2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2024 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Miloslav T. <mi...@re...> - 2005-07-03 17:04:23
|
Hi, On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 02:39:45PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > It is important that you drop a line even > if you found that the alpha version worked well, otherwise we don't know > that the alpha version has been tested and found to be no worse than > 6.2.5 - which is all we're after. 6.2.6.alpha1 (with the patches I'll be sending shortly, although I don't think they made a difference) seems to work fine in a one-mail test here. There's just a minor new annoyance: write_saved_lists() reports "Error deleting ....fetchids: ..." even for ENOENT (when the list was empty and is to be kept empty). Mirek |
From: Jakob H. <jh...@pl...> - 2005-07-02 23:54:59
|
Matthias Andree wrote: > At any rate, some work has taken place though in spite of all > difficulties; over two dozen bugfixes were made, and several other > changes. Details below. Thanks for keeping fetchmail maintained! something with the fetchmailrc parser changed. Mine looks like this: defaults proto pop3 mda "spamc -U /var/run/spamd/socket -x -e /usr/bin/maildrop -d %T" poll mx.freenet.de user xxxxx pass xxxxxxx fetchall ssl poll pop.gmail.com user yy...@gm... pass yyyy fetchall ssl [...] which worked here fine all the time. With the alpha: $ fetchmail -v fetchmail: 6.2.6.alpha1 querying cip.rz.fh-offenburg.de (protocol POP3) at Sat, 02 Jul 2005 23:33:19 +0200 (CEST): poll started [...] fetchmail: POP3< +OK <105...@mx...> fetchmail: POP3> CAPA fetchmail: POP3< +OK fetchmail: POP3< EXPIRE NEVER fetchmail: POP3< TOP fetchmail: POP3< UIDL fetchmail: POP3< USER fetchmail: POP3< XAUTHLIST fetchmail: POP3< XSENDER fetchmail: POP3< STLS fetchmail: POP3< . fetchmail: POP3> USER xxxxxxx pass fetchmail: POP3< +OK user ok fetchmail: POP3> PASS * fetchmail: POP3< -ERR permission denied note the "pass" after "USER xxxxxxx", which seems to come from fetchmailrc. And when terminating: fetchmail: Query status=3 (AUTHFAIL) fetchmail: Error deleting No such file or directory: ì ÿ0è/ÖþÿÄ PhZÿ5¨è fetchmail: Error deleting No such file or directory: ì ÿ0è/ÖþÿÄ PhZÿ5¨è Or when I press ctrl-c: fetchmail: terminated with signal 2 fetchmail: Error deleting No such file or directory: ì ÿ0è/ÖþÿÄ PhZÿ5¨è |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-07-02 14:39:51
|
Greetings, a long time ago, Eric S. Raymond released fetchmail 6.2.5. It was decided that the code was handed to new maintainers, but the handover didn't really improve the maintenance situation - it turned out that the new maintainers had only a little more time than ESR. We have tried to move development to BerliOS to make the development process more visible, but figured that BerliOS's SVN was instable at the time, so we moved the repository again - the new one is stable, and my thanks to Graham Wilson for arranging for the new repo. At any rate, some work has taken place though in spite of all difficulties; over two dozen bugfixes were made, and several other changes. Details below. We know many users appreciate fetchnews, and now it's your chance to help the fetchmail project, by testing the current code, so we can know the next release will be good. I have rolled a snapshot of the current SVN repository contents into a tarball, with the preliminary version tag 6.2.6.alpha1. Download from: <http://home.pages.de/~mandree/fetchmail/fetchmail-6.2.6.alpha1.tar.bz2>. Users who can afford to run a test version of the code, or are annoyed by a particular 6.2.5 bug, are asked to test the code and see if their favorite 6.2.5 bugs are really gone from the alpha version, or if new bugs have appeared, and report problems, important bugs that remain AND are easy to fix to the lists. It is important that you drop a line even if you found that the alpha version worked well, otherwise we don't know that the alpha version has been tested and found to be no worse than 6.2.5 - which is all we're after. Note that the current alpha is mostly untested, so run this on test machines first before putting into production. This comes, as usual, without any guarantees. User feedback on the alpha or upcoming beta versions is an absolute requirement before we can move forward to a new stable release. The changes since 6.2.5 are as follows (taken from the NEWS file): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Developer who merged or committed the patch in parentheses. * Sunil Shetye's fix to force fetchsizelimit to 1 for APOP and RPOP. * PopDel.py removed from contrib at author's request. * Matthias Andree's fix for Sunil Shetye's fetch-split patch * Include James Stone's moldremover.py script. * Enable .fetchmailrc permissions checking under Cygwin. * Nalin Dahyabai's fix for POP3 strong authentication. * Revised Nalin Dahyabai's fix for POP3 strong authentication (Matthias Andree, the original version would go into an infinite loop when CAPA failed; found by David Greaves.) * HOME_ETC patch for PLD Linux. * Sunil Shetye's fix for SSL configuration. * Simon Josefsson's patch for GSS library support. * Added Andrey Lelikov's recupe for Hotmail and Lycos Webmail. * Remove blank between MAIL FROM: and <, which causes Cyrus to complain. Patch by Phil Endecott. (Rob Funk) * Switched to automake. (Matthias Andree) * Build fixes for HESIOD and resolv.h trouble on FreeBSD. (Matthias Andree) * Fabrice Bellet's fix for Red Hat bug #113492, fetchmail hangs in IMAP mode after EXPUNGE when the server (Dovecot 0.99.10) doesn't update RECENT and EXISTS counts. (Matthias Andree) * Holger Mauermann's bounce patch, to use a NULL envelope from, not write a Return-Path header (both to meet RFC-2821), changed From, added Subject header, rewording the human readable part. (Matthias Andree) * Merge Sunil Shetye's time.h handling fix. (Matthias Andree) * Merge Gerd von Egidy's patch to avoid a segfault in multidrop/received mode when the Received: headers are malformatted. (Matthias Andree) * MIME-encode bodies and Subject headers of warning messages (Matthias Andree), limiting the header to 7 bits. * Normalize most locale codesets to IANA codesets, based on norm_charmap.c by Markus Kuhn. (Matthias Andree) * Remove sleep(3) after POP3 login, patch by Brian Candler. (Matthias Andree) * Fix option parsing bug that trashes the showdots setting when more than one server is configured. Patch by Brian Candler. (Matthias Andree) * Honor sslcertpath setting even if sslcertck is unset. Patch by Brian Candler. (Matthias Andree) * SSL certificate checking fixes, don't display same error message twice in succession, make sure that Common Name and fingerprint checking are only done once. Print all validation warnings/errors even if not in verbose mode. Patch by Brian Candler. (Matthias Andree) * Import Bjorn Reese and Daniel Stenberg's MIT-licensed Trio 1.10 from http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/trio/ for systems that do not support snprintf or vsnprintf. (Matthias Andree) * Clean up the horrible #ifdef HAVE_[V]SNPRINTF that made the code unreadable. Use Trio where [v]snprintf is/are missing. (Matthias Andree) * Default to Linux 2.2 /proc/net/dev format, and use uname(2) to determine the kernel version instead of calling uname(1). Thanks to Paul Slootman. (Matthias Andree) * Be more careful when swapping UID lists or writing the .fetchids file, requested by Manfred Weihs. (Matthias Andree) * Print a warning if multidrop configuration is attempted without envelope option. (Matthias Andree) * Split information on fetchmail versions before 6.0.0 to a separate OLDNEWS file. (Matthias Andree) * Merge SuSE patches: (sent by Stanislav Brabec, merged by Matthias Andree) - fetchmail-6.2.5-declaration.patch (double sigint_handler decl/getpass.c) - fetchmail-6.2.5-implicit-declaration.patch (missing #include) - fetchmail-6.2.5-random-result.patch (uninitialized variable/opie.c) * Revised some bogus assertions about POP3 LAST and UIDL use in the manual page. UIDL isn't flaky as the man page suggested, but a reliability feature. In fact, IMAP4 code is flaky in that it relies on the upstream seen flags. (Matthias Andree) * Miloslav Trmac's patch for fetchmailconf to support string-type values of the "port" variable, avoiding "port None" corruption in .fetchmailrc. To fix Redhat Bug #55623 (Matthias Andree) * de.po fixes from Nico Golde (Matthias Andree) * es.po fixes from Jesus Roncero, Debian bug #286044 (Matthias Andree) * sink.c fix from Cesar Eduardo Barros, to avoid double @ in address when username contains an @ and the envelope sender is null, Debian bug #272289 (Matthias Andree) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Matthias Andree |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-07-02 14:02:51
|
Greetings, what are the opinions WRT freezing the current Subversion repository contents and releasing fetchmail 6.3.0-beta1 early next week so that we might be able to release the proper 6.3.0 in August? The code currently compiles on SUSE Linux 9.3/x86, Solaris 8/SPARC and FreeBSD 5.4/x86, and works for me on SUSE Linux 9.3. It has more than two dozen bug fixes since 6.2.5, and several other changes and updates. Regards, -- Matthias Andree |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-07-02 01:08:58
|
Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: > Hi, > * Matthias Andree <mat...@gm...> [2005-07-01 10:24]: >> Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: >> >> > when does Query status=24 happen? >> >> Where or how did you get that message? >> >> 24 is PS_TRANSIENT. > > I took this from the debian bug tracking system. > Bug 250253 OK, the original reporter didn't provide sufficient information and has no way to reproduce the bug. I suggest that this bug be suspended until further information is available -- there are too many code paths to check. -- Matthias Andree |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-07-02 01:05:14
|
Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: > this is the newest bug in the debian bts: > When the local SMTP daemon rejects a message, Fetchmail generates a > bounce messages with a non-null reverse-path, in violation of RFCs. In > addition, the username it uses (FETCHMAIL-DAEMON) does not exist, so any > responses will themselves bounce. This is likely to generate mail > loops. I believe Holger Mauermann's patch fixes most of these issues, from NEWS: * Holger Mauermann's bounce patch, to use a NULL envelope from, not write a Return-Path header (both to meet RFC-2821), changed From, added Subject header, rewording the human readable part. (Matthias Andree) > In addition to generating a bounce, the original mail is forwarded to > postmaster, as can be seen on the last couple of lines above. My > understanding of the man page is that either a bounce should be > generated *or* it should be forwarded to the postmaster address, but not > both. We'd need to check if the SVN version still forwards the message to the postmaster. Perhaps time to roll 6.3.0-beta1 so that people can check if their favorite bugs persist? -- Matthias Andree |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-07-02 01:02:28
|
Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: > please include the attached patch by Andreas Krennmair. > diff -Nurb fetchmail-6.2.5/interface.c fetchmail.new/interface.c > --- fetchmail-6.2.5/interface.c 2003-07-17 17:27:29.000000000 +0200 > +++ fetchmail.new/interface.c 2005-07-01 13:42:33.000000000 +0200 > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > #if defined(HAVE_UNISTD_H) > #include <unistd.h> > #endif > +#include <sys/utsname.h> > #include <sys/ioctl.h> > #include <sys/socket.h> > #include <netinet/in.h> > @@ -75,22 +76,22 @@ > void interface_init(void) > /* figure out which /proc/dev/net format to use */ > { > - FILE *fp = popen("uname -r", "r"); /* still wins if /proc is out */ > + struct utsname ut; > + int rc = uname(&ut); ... > - if (fscanf(fp, "%d.%d.%*d", &major, &minor) >= 2 > + if (sscanf(ut.release, "%d.%d.%*d", &major, &minor) >= 2 > && major >= 2 && minor >= 2) This is bogus. How about major == 3 and minor == 0? It'll assume the old 2.0 format. A similar patch to get rid of the popen() by Paul Slootman has been merged in November 2004, see <http://decoy.wox.org/svn/fetchmail/trunk/interface.c> for the current state. -- Matthias Andree |
From: Rob M. <rob...@gm...> - 2005-07-01 17:45:01
|
On 01/07/05, Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> wrote: > > Mhm ok. But the fetchmail friends list has nothing to do > with the development right? No. -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-07-01 13:53:00
|
Hi, please include the attached patch by Andreas Krennmair. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-07-01 13:16:16
|
Hi, this is the newest bug in the debian bts: When the local SMTP daemon rejects a message, Fetchmail generates a bounce messages with a non-null reverse-path, in violation of RFCs. In addition, the username it uses (FETCHMAIL-DAEMON) does not exist, so any responses will themselves bounce. This is likely to generate mail loops. Also the message it sends has no subject, which is very unhelpful. fetchmailrc: set daemon 60 set postmaster "postmaster" poll pop3.demon.co.uk aka mailstore protocol SDPS interface eth0/192.168.0.1 options localdomains rilynn.demon.co.uk no dns no envelope user rilynn password foo to * options fetchall no rewrite warnings 86400 The relevant part from fetchmail -v -v is below: reading message ri...@po...:1 of 1 (1683 octets) fetchmail: passed through gf...@ri... matching rilynn.demon.co.uk fetchmail: SMTP< 220 rilynn.demon.co.uk ESMTP Exim 4.50 Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:36:27 +0100 fetchmail: SMTP> EHLO localhost fetchmail: SMTP< 250-rilynn.demon.co.uk Hello localhost [127.0.0.1] fetchmail: SMTP< 250-SIZE 52428800 fetchmail: SMTP< 250-PIPELINING fetchmail: SMTP< 250 HELP fetchmail: forwarding to localhost fetchmail: SMTP> MAIL FROM:<ro...@co...> SIZE=1683 fetchmail: SMTP< 250 OK fetchmail: SMTP> RCPT TO:<gf...@ri...> fetchmail: SMTP< 550 unknown user fetchmail: SMTP error: 550 unknown user fetchmail: SMTP listener doesn't like recipient address `gf...@ri...' fetchmail: SMTP< 220 rilynn.demon.co.uk ESMTP Exim 4.50 Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:36:27 +0100 fetchmail: SMTP> HELO localhost fetchmail: SMTP< 250 rilynn.demon.co.uk Hello localhost [127.0.0.1] fetchmail: SMTP> MAIL FROM:<FET...@ri...> *** Should be empty^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ *** fetchmail: SMTP< 250 OK fetchmail: SMTP> RCPT TO:<ro...@co...> fetchmail: SMTP< 250 Accepted fetchmail: SMTP> DATA fetchmail: SMTP< 354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself fetchmail: SMTP: (bounce-message body) fetchmail: SMTP>. (EOM) fetchmail: SMTP< 250 OK id=1Do7dz-0000eX-Cu fetchmail: SMTP> QUIT fetchmail: SMTP< 221 rilynn.demon.co.uk closing connection fetchmail: SMTP> RCPT TO:<postmaster@localhost> fetchmail: SMTP< 250 Accepted fetchmail: no address matches; forwarding to postmaster. In addition to generating a bounce, the original mail is forwarded to postmaster, as can be seen on the last couple of lines above. My understanding of the man page is that either a bounce should be generated *or* it should be forwarded to the postmaster address, but not both. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-07-01 12:18:38
|
Hallo Rob, * Rob MacGregor <rob...@gm...> [2005-07-01 12:14]: > On 30/06/05, Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> wrote: > > Hi, > > why not merging the fetchmail friends list with the > > fetchmail list hosted on berlios? > > It's been tried - if you trawl the berlios archives you may find the > discussions. Mhm ok. But the fetchmail friends list has nothing to do with the development right? regards nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Rob M. <rob...@gm...> - 2005-07-01 11:54:39
|
On 30/06/05, Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> wrote: > Hi, > why not merging the fetchmail friends list with the > fetchmail list hosted on berlios? It's been tried - if you trawl the berlios archives you may find the discussions. -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-07-01 10:32:25
|
Hallo Matthias, * Matthias Andree <mat...@gm...> [2005-07-01 10:24]: > Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: > > > fetchmail -h displays the --logfile argument. > > I had a look at the source code and this option isn't > > supported. It is listed in options.c but has no function. > > Let's postpone this to after the next release, > unless somebody has a patch. ok... regards nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-07-01 10:30:21
|
Hi, * Matthias Andree <mat...@gm...> [2005-07-01 10:24]: > Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: > > > when does Query status=24 happen? > > Where or how did you get that message? > > 24 is PS_TRANSIENT. I took this from the debian bug tracking system. Bug 250253 Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-07-01 09:47:32
|
Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: > fetchmail -h displays the --logfile argument. > I had a look at the source code and this option isn't > supported. It is listed in options.c but has no function. Let's postpone this to after the next release, unless somebody has a patch. -- Matthias Andree |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-07-01 09:46:04
|
Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: > when does Query status=24 happen? Where or how did you get that message? 24 is PS_TRANSIENT. -- Matthias Andree |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-07-01 09:44:22
|
Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: > http://developer.berlios.de/projects/fetchmail > Forbidden > You don't have permission to access /projects/fetchmail on this server. > > Apache/1.3.27 Server at developer.berlios.de Port 80 I cannot reproduce this. Perhaps a temporary hicc-up? -- Matthias Andree |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-07-01 09:42:44
|
Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: > Hi, > what about: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=282259 > ? I can only assume - I haven't looked at the log entries - that someone complained about the sleeping/awake messages disappear from the screen, too. report() doesn't distinguish log from screen, which would be required to fix this. Please remind (or send a patch) after the next release. -- Matthias Andree |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-07-01 00:00:22
|
Hi, when does Query status=24 happen? I found no hint in the source. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-06-30 23:13:10
|
Hi, http://developer.berlios.de/projects/fetchmail Forbidden You don't have permission to access /projects/fetchmail on this server. Apache/1.3.27 Server at developer.berlios.de Port 80 Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-06-30 22:59:02
|
Hi, what about: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=282259 ? Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-06-30 22:55:27
|
Hi, fetchmail -h displays the --logfile argument. I had a look at the source code and this option isn't supported. It is listed in options.c but has no function. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-06-30 22:29:29
|
Hi, why not merging the fetchmail friends list with the fetchmail list hosted on berlios? regards nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-06-30 22:27:48
|
Hi, what about: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=282259 ? Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |
From: Nico G. <ni...@ng...> - 2005-06-30 22:27:45
|
Hi, fetchmail -h displays the --logfile argument. I had a look at the source code and this option isn't supported. It is listed in options.c but has no function. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: ni...@ja... | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred |