From: Ralf B. <Ral...@ou...> - 2005-11-30 13:57:35
|
Hi Regis, I'm not happy too about the fix, at that late stage of the RC. I included it at the same day I got it from Lars. It was a real annouing problem with eGW, which stoped any mature LDAP installation from using = eGW. Therefor I decided to include it. I'm sure it will bring us at least one more RC. Sorry about not informing you beforehand, I thought mentioning it in the commitlog was enough. Ralf regis leroy <reg...@gl...> schrieb:=20 >Ok, >I need to fix it, group management is broken on the workflow because as >I can read in the cvs update from 24.11.2005 (Ralf Becker): > >eGW uses now negative id's for groups, this allows to better support ldap >(you can have users and groups with identical id's) > >Arg. >I was using theses id in table which was mapping roles and user/groups >ids, with a type user/group do avoid collisions. > >I'll fix it, but I just wanted to say such big changes in the API should >maybe be warned for developers. Maybe I'm not the only one using user id >in application tables... > >R=E9gis, > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log >files >for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes >searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id=16865&op=3Dclick >_______________________________________________ >eGroupWare-developers mailing list >eGr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-developers > --=20 Ralf Becker Outdoor Unlimited Training GmbH Leibnizstr. 17 67663 Kaiserslautern |