devil-linux-develop — developer discussions

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] crosscompiling

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

]Aphex[ wrote:
> When building on a i686 for another computer (an i586 or even i486), is 
> the only setting I need to set for this in the make menuconfig? I saw 2 
> places in the menuconfig right next to each other, one for the kernel, 
> one for gcc, are those the only ones I need to set?

Yes correct, but you have to be carefull.
You can not compile for an 686 on a 486, but you can compile for 486 on 
a 686.

Heiko

[Devil-linux-develop] crosscompiling

[]Aphex[ <ap...@ap...>]

When building on a i686 for another computer (an i586 or even i486), is =
the only setting I need to set for this in the make menuconfig? I saw 2 =
places in the menuconfig right next to each other, one for the kernel, =
one for gcc, are those the only ones I need to set?

Alex

[Devil-linux-develop] [PATCH] IMQ complete patch (kernel + userspace)

[Peter F. <pe...@em...>]

All the patches apply cleanly against a vanilla 2.4.26 kernel.

They have also been tested against the ALREADY patched 2.4.26 from
DL...and they work.  HOWEVER, since the current version of DL ALREADY
includes kernel pacthes for IMQ, the kernel specific patch is not needed
(IMQ-kernel-2.4.diff).  The other patches must still be applied.
Kernel Patches:
IMQ-kernel-2.4.diff	   :basic IMQ device creation in the kernel
IMQ-kernel-2.4.26-nat      :needed when IMQ/nat are used concurrently
IMQ-kernel-netfilter-patch :iptables IMQ kernel module

Iptables patches:
IMQ-iptables-1.2.9.diff    :iptables IMQ support

AFTER installing the patch, (patch p1 < filename.diff), there is an
extra step needed.
Under the src/iptables-1.2.9/extensions folder.  You have to:
chmod +x .IMQ-test
That is because the Makefile for iptables runs these patch tests for
every kernel extension before building its own extensions. 

I have included the 2.6 patches as a novelty.  I have NOT used the 2.6
kernel.  I have NOT tested the patches.
I will soon try it...but for now...it is UNTESTED.

The 2.4 patches listed here are fully functional.  I have
compiled/installed and ested them myself.  There should be no
compilation errors.

Note:
I have these patches installed and running on a DL router with 400 users
pounding it.  All 400 users are being pumped through IMQ and my QoS
scripts for traffic control.  The hardware: a PentiumPro 200Mhz.  

-- 
Peter Frischknecht <pe...@em...>
Empowering Solutions, Inc.

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Re: [Devil-linux-commit] build/config/etc/init.d network,1.31,1.32

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> > I upgraded a firewall of mine and all the static route commands bombed.
> > After a little looking it appeared that the "if" statement below was
> > backwards, so I swapped the logic.  I didn't spend a lot of time looking
> > at the logic of the code, only the results of my routes (which now work)
> > I hope I didn't screw it up too bad, Friedrich!  :-)
> 
> What does your routing entry look like? Would be good to know that as the 
> code that you "fixed" looked ok to me - but I did not dig deeper into the 
> matter.

ifcfg-eth0:
ROUTE="$ROUTE 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0:172.16.254.1"

ifcfg-eth1:
ROUTE="$ROUTE default/0.0.0.0:10.18.12.19"

(some public IP's changed to protect the innocent :)

> >> 				# add the route
> >>-				if [ -n "${netmask##*.*}" ]; then
> >>+				if [ -z "${netmask##*.*}" ]; then
> >> 					echo "   adding route to $CMD ${target}${netmask:+/$netmask}${gateway:+ via gateway $gateway} on $DEVICE"
> >> 					route add -$CMD ${target} ${netmask:+netmask $netmask} ${gateway:+gw $gateway} dev $DEVICE
> >> 				else
> 
> This line was obviously from a patch from "Cameron Miller".
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/devil-linux/build/config/etc/init.d/network?r1=1.28&r2=1.29
> and
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/devil-linux/build/config/etc/init.d/network

OK.  I just remembered you committing some changes recently.
I didn't remember (or lookup) where they came from.

 - BS

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Feature Freeze DL 1.1.x -- Preparing for DL 1.2.0 release

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Martin Glazer wrote:
> On April 15, 2004 13:19, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> 
>>Hi Developers!
> 
> 
> Howdy CDO's
> 
> 
>>Heiko, Bruce and myself have come to the agreement that it is time for a
>>new release, namely Devil-Linux 1.2.0.
>>
> 
> 
> Excellent, can't wait...
> 
> 
>>Therefore I am announcing hereby a FEATURE FREEZE in the current
>>Devil-Linux 1.1.x tree so we can prepare for a release of Devil-Linux
>>1.2.0.
>>
>>Anybody working on a patch right now and wanting to have that included in
>>1.2.0 please "SPEAK NOW (or Forever Hold Your Peace)!"(1)
>>
> 
> 
> Me... pick me, pick me!
> 
> 
>>Please understand that we are only going to accept bug fixes from now one.
>>New features have to wait till 1.2.0 is released and the 1.3.x tree opens
>>up.
>>
> 
> 
> I've attached 2 very minor bug fixes - 
> 
> LVM2 patch - fixes compilation failure in LVM2 for 2.4.25 kernel (still set 
> for 2.5.24)

I added wildcards...

> hostapd patch - forces hostapd to go into the background when started - 
> prevents a system hang if started on boot. I know it is supposed to go into 
> the background anyway and gets this info from the config file, but it doesn't 
> work.

DONE

> I'm still planning on getting hostapd working without a lot of manual 
> configuration, but that's a story for another day.
> 

Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Re: [Devil-linux-commit] build/config/etc/init.d network,1.31,1.32

[Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...>]

Bruce Smith wrote on 24.04.2004 02:39 MET:

> I upgraded a firewall of mine and all the static route commands bombed.
> After a little looking it appeared that the "if" statement below was
> backwards, so I swapped the logic.  I didn't spend a lot of time looking
> at the logic of the code, only the results of my routes (which now work)
> I hope I didn't screw it up too bad, Friedrich!  :-)

What does your routing entry look like? Would be good to know that as the 
code that you "fixed" looked ok to me - but I did not dig deeper into the 
matter.

>>Log Message:
>>Fix static routes with full subnet mask not working.
>>
>>
>>Index: network
>>===================================================================
>>RCS file: /cvsroot/devil-linux/build/config/etc/init.d/network,v
>>retrieving revision 1.31
>>retrieving revision 1.32
>>diff -u -d -r1.31 -r1.32
>>--- network	10 Apr 2004 00:14:49 -0000	1.31
>>+++ network	23 Apr 2004 21:12:40 -0000	1.32
>>@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@
>> 				fi
>> 
>> 				# add the route
>>-				if [ -n "${netmask##*.*}" ]; then
>>+				if [ -z "${netmask##*.*}" ]; then
>> 					echo "   adding route to $CMD ${target}${netmask:+/$netmask}${gateway:+ via gateway $gateway} on $DEVICE"
>> 					route add -$CMD ${target} ${netmask:+netmask $netmask} ${gateway:+gw $gateway} dev $DEVICE
>> 				else

This line was obviously from a patch from "Cameron Miller".
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/devil-linux/build/config/etc/init.d/network?r1=1.28&r2=1.29
and
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/devil-linux/build/config/etc/init.d/network

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock                       Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/                         Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________

[Devil-linux-develop] Re: [Devil-linux-commit] build/config/etc/init.d network,1.31,1.32

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

I upgraded a firewall of mine and all the static route commands bombed.
After a little looking it appeared that the "if" statement below was
backwards, so I swapped the logic.  I didn't spend a lot of time looking
at the logic of the code, only the results of my routes (which now work)
I hope I didn't screw it up too bad, Friedrich!  :-)

 - BS


> Log Message:
> Fix static routes with full subnet mask not working.
> 
> 
> Index: network
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/devil-linux/build/config/etc/init.d/network,v
> retrieving revision 1.31
> retrieving revision 1.32
> diff -u -d -r1.31 -r1.32
> --- network	10 Apr 2004 00:14:49 -0000	1.31
> +++ network	23 Apr 2004 21:12:40 -0000	1.32
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@
>  				fi
>  
>  				# add the route
> -				if [ -n "${netmask##*.*}" ]; then
> +				if [ -z "${netmask##*.*}" ]; then
>  					echo "   adding route to $CMD ${target}${netmask:+/$netmask}${gateway:+ via gateway $gateway} on $DEVICE"
>  					route add -$CMD ${target} ${netmask:+netmask $netmask} ${gateway:+gw $gateway} dev $DEVICE
>  				else

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Bugs in upgrade-config.

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

>> > Heiko, At the end of upgrade-config, you added something like:
>> >
>> >   cat newconfig/etc/inittab | sed .... > newconfig/etc/inittab
>> >
>> > I suspected that a SMP box was wiping out inittab before sed got to do
>> > it's thing, and sure enough.  This works fine:
>>
>> Interesting effect....
>
> Yeah, I've seen similar problems in the past.  I never modify a file in
> a pipe and redirect it back to itself.  I hope you don't do that in too
> many other programs.  :-/

Usually I work with a temporary file, but thought in this case it would
work fine...
Another example that we should leave the thinking to the horses, they have
the bigger head. ;-)

-- 
Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Bugs in upgrade-config.

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> > Heiko, At the end of upgrade-config, you added something like:
> >
> >   cat newconfig/etc/inittab | sed .... > newconfig/etc/inittab
> >
> > I suspected that a SMP box was wiping out inittab before sed got to do
> > it's thing, and sure enough.  This works fine:
> 
> Interesting effect....

Yeah, I've seen similar problems in the past.  I never modify a file in
a pipe and redirect it back to itself.  I hope you don't do that in too
many other programs.  :-/

 - BS

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Bugs in upgrade-config.

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

> upgrade-config seems to work fine on a single CPU machine, but fails
> every time on a SMP box.  I tried it on two different SMP boxes.
> Right after upgrade-config completes, it prompts for the user to enter
> the runlevel, and then the system dies (no processes running).
>
> Heiko, At the end of upgrade-config, you added something like:
>
>   cat newconfig/etc/inittab | sed .... > newconfig/etc/inittab
>
> I suspected that a SMP box was wiping out inittab before sed got to do
> it's thing, and sure enough.  This works fine:

Interesting effect....

>   sed ... tmp/ISO/cdtree/sbin/upgrade-config > newconfig/etc/inittab.new
>   mv -f newconfig/etc/inittab.new newconfig/etc/inittab
>
> I committed the change to 1.1.  I don't know if it code is in 1.0, so
> I'll let you take care of that.

It's only in 1.1, because there are some changes to the init system which
need to get upgraded.

> Second bug:
>
> upgrade-config seems to always select /etc/init.d/* files that have
> changed to be copied over by default.  They shouldn't be selected IMO.
>
> Maybe because older installations didn't have the date on those files
> set to 1980?  Or why?  Should I manually exclude them, except for
> firewall.rules?

Yes I think this is a good solution.

-- 
Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

[Devil-linux-develop] Bugs in upgrade-config.

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

upgrade-config seems to work fine on a single CPU machine, but fails
every time on a SMP box.  I tried it on two different SMP boxes.  
Right after upgrade-config completes, it prompts for the user to enter
the runlevel, and then the system dies (no processes running).

Heiko, At the end of upgrade-config, you added something like:

  cat newconfig/etc/inittab | sed .... > newconfig/etc/inittab

I suspected that a SMP box was wiping out inittab before sed got to do
it's thing, and sure enough.  This works fine:

  sed ... tmp/ISO/cdtree/sbin/upgrade-config > newconfig/etc/inittab.new
  mv -f newconfig/etc/inittab.new newconfig/etc/inittab

I committed the change to 1.1.  I don't know if it code is in 1.0, so
I'll let you take care of that.

Second bug:

upgrade-config seems to always select /etc/init.d/* files that have
changed to be copied over by default.  They shouldn't be selected IMO.

Maybe because older installations didn't have the date on those files
set to 1980?  Or why?  Should I manually exclude them, except for
firewall.rules?

 - BS

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] distcc/input files/install-on-usb

[<hzu...@ra...>]

On 04/23/2004 09:44:32 AM Peter Frischknecht wrote:
>Help me out...please.
>
>A few questions:
>
>1-
>If you do a 'make build' w/o distcc and later you decided to enable
>distcc compilation, it does NOT make use of distcc.
>
>I don't want to do an mrproper and have to decompress all the files
>again.  What file, switch, setting do I change to enable distcc
>compilation "after" a first run of 'make build'?

The distcc stuff is not tested very good and could break anyway....
Try this:
scripts/build.sh build opt=prepare
scripts/build.sh build opt=distcc

>2-
>You mentioned using an input file to answer questions if a Makefile
>prompts for answers during the build phase.  Can you give me an example
>of such app/input file?

You have to patch the Makefile.PL , remove the prompt and initialize the
variable with a pre-defined value.
Check the patch files in the src/perl-ext directory to see some examples.

>3-
>what/how do I use the install-on-usb script.
>I made the DUMB mistake of copying it from scripts/scripts to /build and
>ran it.  It deleted my entire tmp folder.  I was so pissed.
>Oh well.  Just tell me how to use it correctly.

after a make dist everything is in the build/dist folder
Just go in there and execute it, it will guide you through the rest.

Heiko

[Devil-linux-develop] distcc/input files/install-on-usb

[Peter F. <pe...@em...>]

Help me out...please.

A few questions:

1-
If you do a 'make build' w/o distcc and later you decided to enable
distcc compilation, it does NOT make use of distcc.

I don't want to do an mrproper and have to decompress all the files
again.  What file, switch, setting do I change to enable distcc
compilation "after" a first run of 'make build'?

2-
You mentioned using an input file to answer questions if a Makefile
prompts for answers during the build phase.  Can you give me an example
of such app/input file?

3-
what/how do I use the install-on-usb script.
I made the DUMB mistake of copying it from scripts/scripts to /build and
ran it.  It deleted my entire tmp folder.  I was so pissed.
Oh well.  Just tell me how to use it correctly. 



-- 
Peter Frischknecht <pe...@em...>
Empowering Solutions, Inc.

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] OpenSSH + Secureid patch?

[Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...>]

Heiko Zuerker wrote on 22.04.2004 18:55 MET:

>>Bruce Smith wrote on 22.04.2004 17:55 MET:
>>
>>
>>>Heiko, do you still need this one?
>>>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=750035&group_id=34096&atid=410646
>>>
>>>It has a high priority, but it's almost a year old.
>>>
>>>Reading about it doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling.
>>>It lags behind new releases of OpenSSH (there is no patch for current
>>>ssh vers right now), and has only been tested on systems that use PAM.
>>>
>>>Unless you still need it, I recommend we delete that feature request.
>>
>>According to
>>   http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/projects/
>>the patch is up to OpenSSH 3.8p1 which is the latest release according to
>>http://www.openssh.org/.
>>
>>If you follow the link "OpenSSH + SecurID HOWTO" to
>>http://www.joerg.cc/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MySecurID-page there is even a
>>reference to possible PAM modules.
>>
>>I don't have a SecurID Card so I can't test it either way.
>>
> 
> Leave it in there, this is interesting for corporate environments.

Ok, Bruce, let's say we let the feature-request stay but add a comment 
saying that we will only apply it if there is a working pam module, as we 
do not want to have some extra dependency for OpenSSH just for that.

Donations like the needed equipment to test the implementation of the whole 
SecureID thing would of course speed up the whole process from out side ;-)

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock                       Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/                         Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] OpenSSH + Secureid patch?

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

> Bruce Smith wrote on 22.04.2004 17:55 MET:
>
>> Heiko, do you still need this one?
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=750035&group_id=34096&atid=410646
>>
>> It has a high priority, but it's almost a year old.
>>
>> Reading about it doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling.
>> It lags behind new releases of OpenSSH (there is no patch for current
>> ssh vers right now), and has only been tested on systems that use PAM.
>>
>> Unless you still need it, I recommend we delete that feature request.
>
> According to
>    http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/projects/
> the patch is up to OpenSSH 3.8p1 which is the latest release according to
> http://www.openssh.org/.
>
> If you follow the link "OpenSSH + SecurID HOWTO" to
> http://www.joerg.cc/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MySecurID-page there is even a
> reference to possible PAM modules.
>
> I don't have a SecurID Card so I can't test it either way.
>

Leave it in there, this is interesting for corporate environments.

-- 
Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] OpenSSH + Secureid patch?

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> > Heiko, do you still need this one?
> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=750035&group_id=34096&atid=410646
> > 
> > It has a high priority, but it's almost a year old.
> > 
> > Reading about it doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling.
> > It lags behind new releases of OpenSSH (there is no patch for current
> > ssh vers right now), and has only been tested on systems that use PAM.
> > 
> > Unless you still need it, I recommend we delete that feature request.
> 
> According to
>    http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/projects/
> the patch is up to OpenSSH 3.8p1 

Yup.

> which is the latest release according to http://www.openssh.org/.

Wrong.  I updated OpenSSH on DL from 3.8p1 to 3.8.1p1 a few days ago.

> If you follow the link "OpenSSH + SecurID HOWTO" to 
> http://www.joerg.cc/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MySecurID-page there is even a 
> reference to possible PAM modules.
> 
> I don't have a SecurID Card so I can't test it either way.

I can't test it either.  I'm checking if anyone [still?] needs it.
If not, let's forget it.  It could be a pain waiting for this secureid
to be updated the next time a security problem is fixed in OpenSSH.

 - BS

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] OpenSSH + Secureid patch?

[Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...>]

Bruce Smith wrote on 22.04.2004 17:55 MET:

> Heiko, do you still need this one?
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=750035&group_id=34096&atid=410646
> 
> It has a high priority, but it's almost a year old.
> 
> Reading about it doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling.
> It lags behind new releases of OpenSSH (there is no patch for current
> ssh vers right now), and has only been tested on systems that use PAM.
> 
> Unless you still need it, I recommend we delete that feature request.

According to
   http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/projects/
the patch is up to OpenSSH 3.8p1 which is the latest release according to 
http://www.openssh.org/.

If you follow the link "OpenSSH + SecurID HOWTO" to 
http://www.joerg.cc/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MySecurID-page there is even a 
reference to possible PAM modules.

I don't have a SecurID Card so I can't test it either way.

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock                       Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/                         Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________

[Devil-linux-develop] OpenSSH + Secureid patch?

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

Heiko, do you still need this one?
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=750035&group_id=34096&atid=410646

It has a high priority, but it's almost a year old.

Reading about it doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling.
It lags behind new releases of OpenSSH (there is no patch for current
ssh vers right now), and has only been tested on systems that use PAM.

Unless you still need it, I recommend we delete that feature request.

 - BS

[Devil-linux-develop] [ devil-linux-Feature Requests-704220 ] add delegate multilevel proxy

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Feature Requests item #704220, was opened at 2003-03-15 19:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by friedl
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=704220&group_id=34096

Category: Packages
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: add delegate multilevel proxy

Initial Comment:
http://www.delegate.org/delegate/

DeleGate is a multi-purpose application level gateway, 
or a proxy server which runs on multiple platforms (Unix, 
Windows, MacOS X and OS/2). DeleGate mediates 
communication of various protocols (HTTP, FTP, NNTP, 
SMTP, POP, Telnet, SOCKS, etc.), applying cache and 
conversion for mediated data, controlling access from 
clients and routing toward servers. It translates protocols 
between clients and servers, applying SSL(TLS) to 
arbitrary protocols, merging several servers into a single 
server view with aliasing and filtering. Born as a tiny 
proxy for Gopher in March 1994, it has steadily grown 
into a general purpose proxy server. Besides proxy, 
DeleGate can be used as a simple origin server for 
some protocols (HTTP, FTP and NNTP).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Date: 2004-04-22 17:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=38090

The suggested software is not free under all circumstances.

Therefore it will not be included in Devil-Linux and this
feature-request will closed.




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bruce Smith (blubdog)
Date: 2004-04-22 17:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=778609

This software is not free under all circumstances.
I'm not sure it should go into DL.  

Look at:
http://www.delegate.org/mail-lists/delegate-en/2449


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=704220&group_id=34096

[Devil-linux-develop] [ devil-linux-Feature Requests-912006 ] add pound

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Feature Requests item #912006, was opened at 2004-03-08 15:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by friedl
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=912006&group_id=34096

Category: Packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: add pound

Initial Comment:
Pound is a reverse HTTP proxy, load balancer, and SSL 
wrapper. It proxies client HTTPS requests to HTTP 
backend servers, distributes the requests among several 
servers while keeping sessions, supports HTTP/1.1 
requests even if the backend server(s) are HTTP/1.0, 
and sanitizes requests. 
http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Friedrich Lobenstock (friedl)
Date: 2004-04-22 17:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=38090

Bruce,

you got the wrong feature-request.

You probably wanted to comment on:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=704220&group_id=34096&atid=410646

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bruce Smith (blubdog)
Date: 2004-04-22 17:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=778609

Never mind previous comment.  I added it to the wrong tracker.
Too many browser windows open.   :-(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bruce Smith (blubdog)
Date: 2004-04-22 17:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=778609

This software is not free under all circumstances.
I'm not sure it should go into DL.  

Look at:
http://www.delegate.org/mail-lists/delegate-en/2449


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=912006&group_id=34096

[Devil-linux-develop] [ devil-linux-Feature Requests-704220 ] add delegate multilevel proxy

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Feature Requests item #704220, was opened at 2003-03-15 13:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by blubdog
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=704220&group_id=34096

Category: Packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: add delegate multilevel proxy

Initial Comment:
http://www.delegate.org/delegate/

DeleGate is a multi-purpose application level gateway, 
or a proxy server which runs on multiple platforms (Unix, 
Windows, MacOS X and OS/2). DeleGate mediates 
communication of various protocols (HTTP, FTP, NNTP, 
SMTP, POP, Telnet, SOCKS, etc.), applying cache and 
conversion for mediated data, controlling access from 
clients and routing toward servers. It translates protocols 
between clients and servers, applying SSL(TLS) to 
arbitrary protocols, merging several servers into a single 
server view with aliasing and filtering. Born as a tiny 
proxy for Gopher in March 1994, it has steadily grown 
into a general purpose proxy server. Besides proxy, 
DeleGate can be used as a simple origin server for 
some protocols (HTTP, FTP and NNTP).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Bruce Smith (blubdog)
Date: 2004-04-22 11:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=778609

This software is not free under all circumstances.
I'm not sure it should go into DL.  

Look at:
http://www.delegate.org/mail-lists/delegate-en/2449


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=704220&group_id=34096

[Devil-linux-develop] [ devil-linux-Feature Requests-912006 ] add pound

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Feature Requests item #912006, was opened at 2004-03-08 09:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by blubdog
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=912006&group_id=34096

Category: Packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: add pound

Initial Comment:
Pound is a reverse HTTP proxy, load balancer, and SSL 
wrapper. It proxies client HTTPS requests to HTTP 
backend servers, distributes the requests among several 
servers while keeping sessions, supports HTTP/1.1 
requests even if the backend server(s) are HTTP/1.0, 
and sanitizes requests. 
http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Bruce Smith (blubdog)
Date: 2004-04-22 11:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=778609

Never mind previous comment.  I added it to the wrong tracker.
Too many browser windows open.   :-(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bruce Smith (blubdog)
Date: 2004-04-22 11:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=778609

This software is not free under all circumstances.
I'm not sure it should go into DL.  

Look at:
http://www.delegate.org/mail-lists/delegate-en/2449


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=912006&group_id=34096

[Devil-linux-develop] [ devil-linux-Feature Requests-912006 ] add pound

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Feature Requests item #912006, was opened at 2004-03-08 09:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by blubdog
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=912006&group_id=34096

Category: Packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: add pound

Initial Comment:
Pound is a reverse HTTP proxy, load balancer, and SSL 
wrapper. It proxies client HTTPS requests to HTTP 
backend servers, distributes the requests among several 
servers while keeping sessions, supports HTTP/1.1 
requests even if the backend server(s) are HTTP/1.0, 
and sanitizes requests. 
http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Bruce Smith (blubdog)
Date: 2004-04-22 11:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=778609

This software is not free under all circumstances.
I'm not sure it should go into DL.  

Look at:
http://www.delegate.org/mail-lists/delegate-en/2449


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=912006&group_id=34096

[Devil-linux-develop] [ devil-linux-Feature Requests-938789 ] add dnsmasq

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Feature Requests item #938789, was opened at 2004-04-20 15:21
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by blubdog
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=938789&group_id=34096

Category: Packages
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73)
>Assigned to: Bruce Smith (blubdog)
Summary: add dnsmasq

Initial Comment:
It's a great caching dns and dhcp server that is very 
easy to configure! It's 
the simplest way to get the machines that register into 
your dhcpserver to 
also get into the domain. Also, if you need to add an 
entry to the domain - 
just edit the /etc/hosts file no more zonefiletroupbles!

http://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=938789&group_id=34096

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Suggestions (not mine :)

[Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...>]

Bruce Smith wrote on 21.04.2004 17:34 MET:
> A couple suggestions sent to me privately.  Thoughts?
> 
>  - BS
> 
> 
> -----Forwarded Message-----
> 
> ...
> somebody other might also have the same scenario and would like to mount
> a share through a firewall. so a good thing would be mount.davfs
> (http://dav.sourceforge.net/) as you can use it to mount a share on a
> DAV-enabled Webserver and usually port 80 or 443 is open on a firewall.
> there is also an interesting kernel patch (http://shfs.sourceforge.net/)
> with which you can mount a filesystem over ssh.

shfs has been added in 1.1.13 (the current development version)

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock                       Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/                         Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________