Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-develop — developer discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(156) |
Dec
(123) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(130) |
Feb
(156) |
Mar
(162) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(97) |
Jun
(127) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(152) |
May
(151) |
Jun
(232) |
Jul
(320) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(271) |
Oct
(536) |
Nov
(301) |
Dec
(393) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(393) |
Feb
(184) |
Mar
(314) |
Apr
(225) |
May
(139) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(9) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(14) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-12-08 15:26:18
|
> > Hi all, > > a few days ago, I downloaded source code from X.org and build it on my > SuSE > Workstation ... they use "lndir" so one can keep clean sources ... > (lndir makes a "ghost" image of a given directory with symlinks) > > ... I found this is a good practice and tried it with DL ... > > The building process stops in the early install stage :-( > > It looks like the tmp/ETC/etc directory is all messed up ... symlinks > point to > nothing (missing one more ../ in the relative path) > > I couldn't find which is the script responsible for the creation of > tmp/ETC/ > directory > > Any Idea ? I bet most of our scripts will have issues with the symlinks. I don't know of the top of my head which script it is, try one which starts with "create" or "mk" or "make" -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: <ee...@fr...> - 2004-12-08 14:02:50
|
>>looks like module mousedev.o in /lib/.../kernel/drivers/input/ didn't g= et into >>> the distro ... > > >It appears to be there on my 1.2.1 system: > Yes it is! I looked at an old 1.0.6 ... sorry! > >>> the lack of it prevent hid.o from loading ... >>> everything looks fine in build/scripts/config/config_linux >>> >>> ... >>> CONFIG_USB_HID=3Dm >>> CONFIG_USB_HIDINPUT=3Dy >>> CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV=3Dy >>> CONFIG_USB_KBD=3Dm >>> CONFIG_USB_MOUSE=3Dm >>> ... > > >I wonder if something needs to be preloaded in INITRD_MODULES ? >(/etc/sysconfig/config) > I don't think as there is no need of it in the boot process MaNU -- |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-12-08 13:44:16
|
> looks like module mousedev.o in /lib/.../kernel/drivers/input/ didn't get into > the distro ... It appears to be there on my 1.2.1 system: root@rt3:/lib/modules/2.4.28/kernel/drivers/input # ll total 15 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7876 Jan 1 1980 evdev.o -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8548 Jan 1 1980 input.o -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4344 Jan 1 1980 keybdev.o -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8416 Jan 1 1980 mousedev.o root@rt3:/lib/modules/2.4.28/kernel/drivers/input # > the lack of it prevent hid.o from loading ... > everything looks fine in build/scripts/config/config_linux > > ... > CONFIG_USB_HID=m > CONFIG_USB_HIDINPUT=y > CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV=y > CONFIG_USB_KBD=m > CONFIG_USB_MOUSE=m > ... I wonder if something needs to be preloaded in INITRD_MODULES ? (/etc/sysconfig/config) - BS |
|
From: <ee...@fr...> - 2004-12-08 13:14:51
|
>>Dear, >>> >>> i'm new to the dl mailinglist and i will using the DL 1.2.1 on a book= -size >pc >>> without any PS/2 keyboard connectors. >>> Is DL supporting USB keyboards ? > > >Hi, > >did a quick try to see that my DL-box doesn't like usb Keyboards ... > >anyway I'll look at it to fix this if the core developers don't as I thi= nk it's >a Lack! > >Regards > >MaNU looks like module mousedev.o in /lib/.../kernel/drivers/input/ didn't get= into the distro ... the lack of it prevent hid.o from loading ... everything looks fine in build/scripts/config/config_linux ... CONFIG_USB_HID=3Dm CONFIG_USB_HIDINPUT=3Dy CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV=3Dy CONFIG_USB_KBD=3Dm CONFIG_USB_MOUSE=3Dm ... ... investigating ... as soon as make prepare build finishes ... -- |
|
From: <ee...@fr...> - 2004-12-08 12:27:03
|
> Dear, > > i'm new to the dl mailinglist and i will using the DL 1.2.1 on a book-s= ize pc > without any PS/2 keyboard connectors. > Is DL supporting USB keyboards ? Hi, did a quick try to see that my DL-box doesn't like usb Keyboards ... anyway I'll look at it to fix this if the core developers don't as I thin= k it's a Lack! Regards MaNU -- |
|
From: <ee...@fr...> - 2004-12-08 11:04:32
|
Hi all, a few days ago, I downloaded source code from X.org and build it on my Su= SE Workstation ... they use "lndir" so one can keep clean sources ... (lndir makes a "ghost" image of a given directory with symlinks) ... I found this is a good practice and tried it with DL ... The building process stops in the early install stage :-( It looks like the tmp/ETC/etc directory is all messed up ... symlinks poi= nt to nothing (missing one more ../ in the relative path) I couldn't find which is the script responsible for the creation of tmp/E= TC/ directory Any Idea ? -- |
|
From: <ee...@fr...> - 2004-12-06 19:56:41
|
>> >> Hi all, >> >> I refresh my 1.2 branch build env. this night and encounter 2 problems= : >> >> * each source package get re-downloaded when using "update_src" even = if >> it >> hadn't been updated since last time (2 weeks ago) ... (same pb using m= ain >> mirror, or Lille or ircam) ... not much annoying, only waste of bandwi= dth >> ;-) >> >> * I get 2 md5 checksums errors : pci.ids.bz2 and usb.ids.bz2. As you = just >> released 1.2.2, maybe md5sum.lst didnt get updated ... >> >> any Idea ? > Ooops, that was my fault. > Ignore it, until we can fix it. You're excused for this time ... build made me an iso ;-) -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is spons= ored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hy= pe. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-develop maili= ng list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop -- |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-12-06 15:20:59
|
> At 05:07 24/11/2004, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >>>Anyway, I had some little problems when I tried to start a ldap/samba >>>server : >>> - there is no libnss_ldap > >>For which functionality is it needed? (AD integration?) >>My samba server starts fine. > > Samba need to know all defined users, they have to exist : > - in samba world > - in the host system (ie Devil-Linux). > > So, Samba can get Samba users by ldap (smb.conf parameters), but > Devil-Linux have to get them too ! > nss_ldap is required for that ;-) > > If users are only known by Samba, it doesn't works, because Samba will > verify that they exist in the system map... OK that's reason enough to add it to DL. Thanks for the explanation. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-12-06 15:20:21
|
> > Hi all, > > I refresh my 1.2 branch build env. this night and encounter 2 problems : > > * each source package get re-downloaded when using "update_src" even if > it > hadn't been updated since last time (2 weeks ago) ... (same pb using main > mirror, or Lille or ircam) ... not much annoying, only waste of bandwidth > ;-) > > * I get 2 md5 checksums errors : pci.ids.bz2 and usb.ids.bz2. As you just > released 1.2.2, maybe md5sum.lst didnt get updated ... > > any Idea ? Ooops, that was my fault. Ignore it, until we can fix it. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Jean-Luc P. <Jea...@ib...> - 2004-12-06 09:35:34
|
At 05:07 24/11/2004, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>Anyway, I had some little problems when I tried to start a ldap/samba
>>server :
>> - there is no libnss_ldap
>For which functionality is it needed? (AD integration?)
>My samba server starts fine.
Samba need to know all defined users, they have to exist :
- in samba world
- in the host system (ie Devil-Linux).
So, Samba can get Samba users by ldap (smb.conf parameters), but
Devil-Linux have to get them too !
nss_ldap is required for that ;-)
If users are only known by Samba, it doesn't works, because Samba will
verify that they exist in the system map...
Best regards,
- pjluc
---------------------
Jean-Luc Parouty - Phone: +33 4 387 823 90
Institut de Biologie Structurale-CNRS (UMR 5075)/CEA/UJF - IBS
41 Av. Jules Horowitz - 38027 Grenoble Cedex 1 - France
|
|
From: <ee...@fr...> - 2004-12-06 09:02:39
|
Hi all, I refresh my 1.2 branch build env. this night and encounter 2 problems : * each source package get re-downloaded when using "update_src" even if = it hadn't been updated since last time (2 weeks ago) ... (same pb using main mirror, or Lille or ircam) ... not much annoying, only waste of bandwidth= ;-) * I get 2 md5 checksums errors : pci.ids.bz2 and usb.ids.bz2. As you jus= t released 1.2.2, maybe md5sum.lst didnt get updated ... any Idea ? -- |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-11-24 04:10:13
|
Jean-Luc Parouty wrote: > > Hello, > > First, congratulation for the works :-) > > I try it few weeks ago, and now I replace all of my red^H^H big > historical linux by some small Devil ;-)) > > Anyway, I had some little problems when I tried to start a ldap/samba > server : > > - there is no libnss_ldap For which functionality is it needed? (AD integration?) My samba server starts fine. > - php wasn' t compiled with --with-gettext, so lam doen't work... > > - only one network module can be specified, so in > heterogen environment, we have to change the > MODULE in /etc/sysconfig/nic/ifcfg-ethx > > So, I propose the following little modifications, in the archive file : > > In the tar file : > > network.diff > nss_ldap > nss_ldap.config > php.diff > profiles-default.diff > > With : > > 1/ patches-1.2.1-pjluc/network.diff > > With this small patch, we can specify more than one > module in the MODULE directive : > MODULE="8139too pcnet32" > > We will test them at start : > (...) > Shutting Down WLAN Devices: Shutting Down WLAN > Devices: [ OK ] > try module: 8139too (unsupported) > try module: pcnet32 (ok) > Starting DHCP client daemon on interface eth0 > (...) I have to reject this patch. You can specify different MODULE= lines for each ifcfg-ethX file, which should solve your problem. It is important for us, that you can specify additional parameters for the module (like IO= for older ISA card), which is not possible with your solution. > 2/ patches-1.2.1-pjluc/nss_ldap > patches-1.2.1-pjluc/nss_ldap.config > patches-1.2.1-pjluc/profiles-default.diff > > I add the nss_ldap module, with option in the menuconfig > engine... (set to "yes" by default) I will hold off on this one for a little while (rather add it to 1.3). Of course if there's demanding interest, I'll add it to 1.2. > 3/ patches-1.2.1-pjluc/php.diff > > Just the addition of the --with-gettext options for php... Added to 1.2 and 1.3 > > > I hope this small contribution could be usefull ;-) > Sorry if I'm wrong : I'm not very familiar with cvs & patches > protocoles... ! I was perfect, nothing to complain about. Heiko |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-11-03 19:21:31
|
> Sorry for breaking the thread. > > Forwarded message: > > Hey Zsolt, > > >> I would like that you upgrade the LCD4Linux package from 0.9.11 > version > >> to latest cvs version in 1.2 and main tree. > >> http://lcd4linux.sourceforge.net/download.html > > > > Can you explain why? > > Hi Heiko, > > Yes, I am trying to explain it. > The 0.9.11 version is not maintained anymore. The developers of > LCD4Linux rewrote the whole code and they say that it is stable > enough, it lacks only the documentation ;-) > > But you are right in hesitating to upgrade to the cvs version. > I'll refresh my build system and I try to do it for myself. > If it'll be successfull then I'll report it to you. Yes I would prefer to do it this way, since I can't test it. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Zsolt Z. <zs...@ma...> - 2004-11-03 19:02:25
|
Sorry for breaking the thread. Forwarded message: Hey Zsolt, >> I would like that you upgrade the LCD4Linux package from 0.9.11 version >> to latest cvs version in 1.2 and main tree. >> http://lcd4linux.sourceforge.net/download.html > > Can you explain why? Hi Heiko, Yes, I am trying to explain it. The 0.9.11 version is not maintained anymore. The developers of LCD4Linux rewrote the whole code and they say that it is stable enough, it lacks only the documentation ;-) But you are right in hesitating to upgrade to the cvs version. I'll refresh my build system and I try to do it for myself. If it'll be successfull then I'll report it to you. Bye, Zsolt |
|
From: wwwwe r. <pa...@gm...> - 2004-11-03 09:56:17
|
It works perfectly! Thanks a lot!!! Matteo -- NEU +++ DSL Komplett von GMX +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl GMX DSL-Netzanschluss + Tarif zum supergünstigen Komplett-Preis! |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-11-02 14:38:15
|
> >Thanks a lot Bruce, but the main ftp site deny me the access to the file,is > >there any problem? > > It should work now. Sorry, my fault. I forgot to reset the permissions after uploading it. - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-11-02 14:17:23
|
wwwwe rrrre wrote: >Thanks a lot Bruce, but the main ftp site deny me the access to the file,is >there any problem? > > It should work now. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: wwwwe r. <pa...@gm...> - 2004-11-02 09:11:59
|
Thanks a lot Bruce, but the main ftp site deny me the access to the file,is there any problem? Matteo -- Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail + 3 Top-Spielfilme auf DVD ++ Jetzt kostenlos testen http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ++ |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-10-31 20:39:38
|
> >Of course that's assuming I can still compile DL ... I just upgraded > >all my desktops to SuSE 9.2 and haven't tried a DL compile yet. :-) > > > Please give us a report, I was thinking about buying 9.2 too. Seems to work fine. I ran a 1.2 compile on my SuSE 9.2 desktop overnight and it completed without a problem. I'll reply to the rest of this email later; no time now... - BS |
|
From: MaNU & S. <ee...@fr...> - 2004-10-30 08:58:39
|
Bruce Smith a =E9crit : >>>I have some ideas about a server .config profile I'd like to run by yo= u, >>> =20 >>> >>I thought we already did? Anyhow, you can do it if you maintain the con= fig >>file. >> =20 >> > >I've been thinking and talking about it, but haven't done it yet. > =20 > So Do I ... not "happy" to find DVDCSS or ALSA on a firewall ... >First I need to decide how to configure the security settings. >Getting rid of grsecurity is a given, but what about the other ones? > >I see a "server" as something that should run as fast as possible, >so how much of a performance hit are the other security options? =20 >Any idea? Or should I just remove them all? > >And, if we create a "server", should we remove some services from the >default profile? Maybe drop some stuff that really shouldn't be run on >a firewall, like samba, etc? Or drop the default profile and only have >a router profile and a server profile? > > =20 > I love this idea as it keeps DL from becoming a general Distro (we're=20 not so far from including X ;-)) >Essentially switch to a firewall release AND a server release, and not >combine the two? Or add the server option and leave the others alone? > > =20 > >>>if it's not too much work to add another one. >>> =20 >>> >>I was thinking about dropping support for i486 in the 1.3 series and fo= r >>that only providing a i586-SMP. >> =20 >> > >Sounds good to me! A i586-SMP firewall, and a i686-SMP server release? > > =20 > 100% Agree >>>I could also help with some of the compiling and uploading if you like= . >>> =20 >>> >>Oh I would certainly appreciate that ! >> =20 >> > >You'll have to tell me the steps you follow to compile the official >releases (along with stuff on how to get rid of the date as part of the >release number, etc.) > >Of course that's assuming I can still compile DL ... I just upgraded >all my desktops to SuSE 9.2 and haven't tried a DL compile yet. :-) > > =20 > How do you manage to get it so early? Please tell us about it! Worth=20 spending 90 =80 or wait 1 month for ftp? Best Regards --=20 Emmanuel ESCARABAJAL Sys-Admin et Logiciels Libres ee...@fr... |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-10-30 02:58:58
|
Bruce Smith wrote: >>>I have some ideas about a server .config profile I'd like to run by you, >>> >>> >>I thought we already did? Anyhow, you can do it if you maintain the config >>file. >> >> > >I've been thinking and talking about it, but haven't done it yet. > >First I need to decide how to configure the security settings. >Getting rid of grsecurity is a given, but what about the other ones? > >I see a "server" as something that should run as fast as possible, >so how much of a performance hit are the other security options? >Any idea? Or should I just remove them all? > > I'm not sure if it is wise, I would at least keep the ssp. >And, if we create a "server", should we remove some services from the >default profile? Maybe drop some stuff that really shouldn't be run on >a firewall, like samba, etc? Or drop the default profile and only have >a router profile and a server profile? > > I would not change the default profile. Maintaining one more profile (like router) I would not do, because of the work it will cause. >Essentially switch to a firewall release AND a server release, and not >combine the two? Or add the server option and leave the others alone? > > > I'd say add server, leave others alone. The router profile is not maintained right now, so you can get rif of it if you want. >>>if it's not too much work to add another one. >>> >>> >>I was thinking about dropping support for i486 in the 1.3 series and for >>that only providing a i586-SMP. >> >> > >Sounds good to me! A i586-SMP firewall, and a i686-SMP server release? > > > i586-SMP default i686-SMP server sounds good to me. >>>I could also help with some of the compiling and uploading if you like. >>> >>> >>Oh I would certainly appreciate that ! >> >> > >You'll have to tell me the steps you follow to compile the official >releases (along with stuff on how to get rid of the date as part of the >release number, etc.) > > That's easy, let's do it offline. >Of course that's assuming I can still compile DL ... I just upgraded >all my desktops to SuSE 9.2 and haven't tried a DL compile yet. :-) > > Please give us a report, I was thinking about buying 9.2 too. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-10-29 19:41:21
|
> > I have some ideas about a server .config profile I'd like to run by you, > > I thought we already did? Anyhow, you can do it if you maintain the config > file. I've been thinking and talking about it, but haven't done it yet. First I need to decide how to configure the security settings. Getting rid of grsecurity is a given, but what about the other ones? I see a "server" as something that should run as fast as possible, so how much of a performance hit are the other security options? Any idea? Or should I just remove them all? And, if we create a "server", should we remove some services from the default profile? Maybe drop some stuff that really shouldn't be run on a firewall, like samba, etc? Or drop the default profile and only have a router profile and a server profile? Essentially switch to a firewall release AND a server release, and not combine the two? Or add the server option and leave the others alone? > > if it's not too much work to add another one. > > I was thinking about dropping support for i486 in the 1.3 series and for > that only providing a i586-SMP. Sounds good to me! A i586-SMP firewall, and a i686-SMP server release? > > I could also help with some of the compiling and uploading if you like. > > Oh I would certainly appreciate that ! You'll have to tell me the steps you follow to compile the official releases (along with stuff on how to get rid of the date as part of the release number, etc.) Of course that's assuming I can still compile DL ... I just upgraded all my desktops to SuSE 9.2 and haven't tried a DL compile yet. :-) - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-10-29 19:19:47
|
>> > Are there any updates/fixes currently outstanding? >> >> Nope. >> I guess I'll do some software updates, but other then that nothing is in >> the pipe so far. >> I only want to release a new version when this makes sense, because it's >> a >> pain in my 'behind' to compile and upload all those versions ( 2 uploads >> per version). > > Understood. > > So, with that said, what you think about adding another version? :-) Aargh ;-) > I have some ideas about a server .config profile I'd like to run by you, I thought we already did? Anyhow, you can do it if you maintain the config file. > if it's not too much work to add another one. I was thinking about dropping support for i486 in the 1.3 series and for that only providing a i586-SMP. > I could also help with some of the compiling and uploading if you like. Oh I would certainly appreciate that ! -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-10-29 19:06:17
|
> > Are there any updates/fixes currently outstanding? > > Nope. > I guess I'll do some software updates, but other then that nothing is in > the pipe so far. > I only want to release a new version when this makes sense, because it's a > pain in my 'behind' to compile and upload all those versions ( 2 uploads > per version). Understood. So, with that said, what you think about adding another version? :-) I have some ideas about a server .config profile I'd like to run by you, if it's not too much work to add another one. I could also help with some of the compiling and uploading if you like. - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-10-29 18:41:18
|
>> > I have a i686-SMP 1.2.1-pre-release compiled without grsecurity. >> > It also has all the outstanding bugs fixed from 1.2 (pptp, etc.) >> > I can put it on the FTP site if Heiko doesn't mind. Heiko? >> >> Sure go ahead. > > It's on the FTP site now (and hopefully the mirrors tomorrow): > > /pub/devel/testing/devil-linux-1.2.1-2004-10-26-i686-SMP-bs.tar.bz2 > >> I wanted to collect a few more updates/fixes, before we release an >> official 1.2.1 > > Are there any updates/fixes currently outstanding? Nope. I guess I'll do some software updates, but other then that nothing is in the pipe so far. I only want to release a new version when this makes sense, because it's a pain in my 'behind' to compile and upload all those versions ( 2 uploads per version). -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
35 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
